Anisotropy — where it appears
Named by 27 essays across 7 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
No picture surface keeps everything
A picture has to be cast onto something, and every candidate surface destroys something different. Six of them are measured here on the same three properties, and the corner of the plot where a surface pays nothing is empty — not because nobody has thought of one, but because a theorem says there is none.
The cylinder, and the price of going all the way round
A cylindrical picture can hold three hundred and sixty degrees, keeps every vertical vertical, and bows every horizontal. Its cost is a stretch of sec φ in elevation, which is also the equirectangular surface's cost exactly — two surfaces that are always described as different and are identical in the one respect anybody notices.
Stereographic keeps every angle, and only stereographic
One surface in the family preserves shape exactly — every right angle stays a right angle and both its arms are magnified equally, to the last bit the arithmetic has. It also sends every circle in the world to a circle in the picture, which the site's existing conic fit can be pointed at and asked to confirm without being told what it is looking at.
The sky inside a cone
From under water the whole sky — every direction out to the horizon — arrives inside a cone of 48.61°. Outside it the surface is a mirror. That cone is a picture surface, and it has a distortion no surface in the curved field has — an area scale that runs to zero.
The render is distorted on purpose
A headset renders a bent picture so its lens can straighten it, which is a lens's distortion polynomial run backwards, and the one case in which distortion is introduced deliberately. The round trip closes to a thousandth of a millionth of a pixel, and the price is that one rendered pixel becomes 0.493 delivered pixels at the edge of the field and one at the centre.
A map along, and a picture across
The midpoint of a segment lying along a scroll's length images to the midpoint of its image, exactly. The midpoint of a receding one lands 22% of the way off. One projection, two answers — and the direction that keeps measure keeps something a perspective picture never offers.
The pixel that is not square
A camera with two focal lengths is a real thing — anamorphic cinema optics, non-square photosites, a stretched video format. Hand the round trip of camera recovery a picture from one and it returns a focal length 49.6% out, a principal point far from the truth, three independent estimates agreeing to 1e-16, and bundle residuals at the noise floor. Every alarm the site has stays silent.
Oblique is a shear, and the shear is the whole system
Cavalier and cabinet are usually introduced as easy perspective for people with a set square. They are not a simplification of anything — they are the answer to a demand no orthographic projection can meet, which is a front face at true size and a depth axis at full length at the same time. The two are locked on a unit circle, and buying both costs exactly 45° of obliquity.
The arcs a curvilinear drawing uses
The taught way to draw a very wide view by hand is to run every straight edge of the world as a circular arc. That recipe has been repeated for sixty years without a surface attached to it, and it turns out to name one exactly — fitting a general conic to the image of a straight line returns a circle to nine decimal places under stereographic projection and returns nothing like a circle under any of the other standard picture surfaces.
A ruler on an isometric drawing
Isometric drawing has one scale — 0.8165 — and every account of it stops there. But that number is about three directions and a drawing has infinitely many, so a length measured off the paper and divided by 0.8165 comes back anywhere between √(1/2) and √(3/2) of the truth: 29.3% short to 22.5% long, with nothing in the picture to say which.
One parameter between two surfaces
Wide architectural views are usually made on a projection with a number attached to it — a family running from the flat plane at one end toward the cylinder at the other, with everybody using the value one. That value has never been given a geometric defence. Measured across the family with the same battery of tests as every other surface, the worst angular error over the field has a minimum, and the minimum is at 1.04.
Conformal is not undistorted
The most distorted-looking picture in ordinary circulation is the little planet — a 360 photograph re-projected from below, with the ground curled into a ball. Its worst angular error over 160 degrees of the sphere is 4.4e-8 degrees, which is arithmetic noise. Every crossing in the original crosses at exactly the same angle in the result, and what has gone is area, over a factor of 255.
A pond in a scroll is not an ellipse
A pinhole draws a round pond as an exact ellipse whose widest row is 3.58 px off the row of the pond's centre — the drawn-circle error every perspective textbook warns about. A handscroll draws the same pond widest exactly on its centre's row, and draws it as a quartic that no conic fits: the best ellipse misses it by 3.08 px. Each keeps what the other loses, and off to one side the pinhole's pond leans 9.67 px while the scroll's does not lean at all.
The ellipse the drawing office draws
Every isometric ellipse template is cut to a construction of four circular arcs, and every account of it calls the result an ellipse. It is not one and cannot be: a circular arc has constant curvature and a conic's varies, so the two can agree at four points and nowhere between. The four-centre curve reaches 2√2/3 of the true semi-major axis — 5.72% short — and its minor axis is 3.53% too long.
Six flat pictures of everything
There is one way to photograph the whole sphere and keep every straight line straight, and it is to stop using one surface. Six flat pictures at ninety degrees cover everything, each of them a perfect pinhole, and the price is paid entirely at the seams — where a straight line does not bend but kinks, by an angle that reaches 45 degrees and is exactly zero for the lines lying in the seam's own plane.
The corner sees an ellipse
A circular pupil viewed from off the axis is foreshortened by the cosine, so the blur patch a corner receives is an ellipse of axis ratio 0.920 at the edge of a full-frame picture with a 50 mm lens — and the light through it falls as the fourth power of the same cosine, 0.480 stops. Both are geometry, both happen to a perfect lens, and no design removes either.
The lines a surface leaves alone
Only the plane draws every straight line straight, which is easy to measure and which gets read as though a curved surface bent everything. It does not. Every curved picture surface here keeps a one-parameter family of world lines exactly straight, and the family is a curve on the sphere of lines rather than a region of it — so a grid of samples finds none of it, which is what the first version of this measurement reported.
The evenness a curve buys
A curved screen is sold on evenness, and evenness turns out to be three quantities that disagree. On pixel pitch the curve wins from every seat; on the angle the glass is turned through it wins until three and a half metres along the sofa; on the plain distance from eye to glass — the reading the argument is usually made in — it gives up before half a metre.
The true shape of a cut
A plane through a box makes a hexagon of 2.8996 m². The front view draws it at 1.9966 m² — the true area times the cosine, 0.6886 — and gets its corners wrong as well, the worst by 15.60°, because a foreshortening scales one direction and not the other. The area is recoverable with one number and the angles are not, which is why a section gets a view of its own.
The third column is area
This field has measured what each picture surface does to straight lines and to shape. Both are questions for somebody looking at the picture. Somebody counting in it wants a third column, and the same projections have been returning it all along without anybody asking: the equal-area fisheye holds a square degree at one printed area to 8e-8 across 80° off axis, while a flat plane inflates it 191-fold.
The answer is an ellipse
A mark read with a round error does not come back as a round region on the ground. The ray is grazing, so a pixel across the picture is worth a little and a pixel up it is worth a great deal, and the recovered point's uncertainty is an ellipse pointing at the camera — 5.07 to 1 at eight metres from a camera 1.62 m up, which is the depth over the height. Propagated and sampled agree to 0.5 per cent, and a ray that is not grazing gives a disc.
A circle off the coordinate planes
An ellipse template is cut at one ratio, and the ratio is the cosine of one angle: between a coordinate plane's normal and the direction of projection. A face tilted out of that plane needs a different ratio and — the half that gets drawn wrong even when the ratio is close — a major axis pointing somewhere else, perpendicular to the drawn normal rather than to any edge.
A picture that can be printed
Two screens are fed the surface that is exactly right for each, so nothing about the viewer is left in the answer. What remains is whether the picture can be made flat before it goes up — and a cylinder unrolls while a sphere does not, so the dome's picture is stretched by eighteen per cent between its middle and its rim before anybody sits down.
A pole is a line
An equirectangular surface sends one direction to a whole edge, so an 8° cap of sky at the pole takes 4.50 per cent of the marks against a 0.49 per cent share of the world. The worst singularity is not the pole at all — the equidistant fisheye's antipode costs ×17.9 — and only the cube map, which never holds a sphere in one chart, is bounded.
One face, one scale
A design carried from a point onto a flat face varies in scale by nearly six across that one face; the same design carried along a direction varies by 1.000000000. The stretch is reported here as the two singular values of the local map rather than as one directional difference, which is the honest form and which the previous round owed.
The kink at a seam
A cube map is six flat pictures, so every great circle is drawn exactly straight inside a face — to 3e-15 of its chord — and breaks at the join. The break is a kink and not a bend, it is exactly zero at a seam's midpoint whatever the slant, and it is bounded by 2·atan(½) = 53.130° at the corner.
The eye is a picture surface too
A retinal sphere behind an off-centre nodal point takes every measurement this collection puts to a lens or a screen, and answers all of them. It is the equal-area fisheye to within 110 micrometres of retina rather than the equidistant one everybody draws it as, and a flat picture at its own correct distance leaves the identical arc on it, to 1.4e-14 degrees.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Area scalePicture surfaceConformalfield of viewDemonstrationEquirectangularForeshorteningDrawing systemFisheyeGnomonicStereographic projectionTaught and unmeasured