Equirectangular — where it appears
Named by 16 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
No picture surface keeps everything
A picture has to be cast onto something, and every candidate surface destroys something different. Six of them are measured here on the same three properties, and the corner of the plot where a surface pays nothing is empty — not because nobody has thought of one, but because a theorem says there is none.
The cylinder, and the price of going all the way round
A cylindrical picture can hold three hundred and sixty degrees, keeps every vertical vertical, and bows every horizontal. Its cost is a stretch of sec φ in elevation, which is also the equirectangular surface's cost exactly — two surfaces that are always described as different and are identical in the one respect anybody notices.
Stereographic keeps every angle, and only stereographic
One surface in the family preserves shape exactly — every right angle stays a right angle and both its arms are magnified equally, to the last bit the arithmetic has. It also sends every circle in the world to a circle in the picture, which the site's existing conic fit can be pointed at and asked to confirm without being told what it is looking at.
When the picture surface is not flat
A flat picture plane keeps straight lines straight and stretches the edges without bound. A cylindrical one spreads the stretch evenly and bends every straight line that is not through the axis. Neither is the distorted one — they are answers to different questions, and the choice decides what a wide view can be.
What a 360-degree photograph actually is
The format every spherical camera writes preserves nothing — not straightness, not shape, not area — and it is the right choice anyway, for a reason that has nothing to do with looking at it. An equirectangular file is a lookup table of directions, and the picture only exists at the moment something re-projects a piece of it.
A scroll is not a panorama
Both draw straight world lines as curves, and one of them is a projection. A rotating eye keeps its centre exactly however far it turns; a translating eye has none at all. Curvature and centrelessness are independent properties, and conflating them is the standard mistake about both objects.
Conformal is not undistorted
The most distorted-looking picture in ordinary circulation is the little planet — a 360 photograph re-projected from below, with the ground curled into a ball. Its worst angular error over 160 degrees of the sphere is 4.4e-8 degrees, which is arithmetic noise. Every crossing in the original crosses at exactly the same angle in the result, and what has gone is area, over a factor of 255.
The lines a surface leaves alone
Only the plane draws every straight line straight, which is easy to measure and which gets read as though a curved surface bent everything. It does not. Every curved picture surface here keeps a one-parameter family of world lines exactly straight, and the family is a curve on the sphere of lines rather than a region of it — so a grid of samples finds none of it, which is what the first version of this measurement reported.
Drawn for the cylinder, shown on the cylinder
Four essays in this collection have named the arrangement where a picture's surface and a screen's surface are the same surface, and none has run it. It is exact — a tenth of a millionth of an arcminute — and the exactness is not the finding. Three separate things have to be true at once, and a curved television's own maker prints a sitting distance where the first of them is out by five degrees.
Three conditions, and three prices
A matched picture needs the seat, the horizontal scale and the vertical law all at once. Each is broken alone here with the other two held, and all three turn out to be linear in the mismatch — the unforgiving case, with no margin at all. The vertical law costs a third of an arcminute on a television and eighty-four on a dome, because it is the difference between an angle and its tangent and that difference is cubic in the picture's vertical field.
The surface a screen wants
Six picture surfaces laid on one screen and viewed from the seat its curvature names, each with its own extents fitted so the ranking is about shape rather than scale. Each screen's own surface is exactly right on it and nothing else is — and on a curved television the runner-up is a fifth of an arcminute behind, which nobody can see.
A picture that can be printed
Two screens are fed the surface that is exactly right for each, so nothing about the viewer is left in the answer. What remains is whether the picture can be made flat before it goes up — and a cylinder unrolls while a sphere does not, so the dome's picture is stretched by eighteen per cent between its middle and its rim before anybody sits down.
Where a surface spends its pixels
A picture surface is a budget before it is anything else, and the six named ones distribute the same marks over the same directions quite differently. The flat plane lays 25.0 times as many on a square degree at the edge of a 70° field as on one at the centre; the equal-area fisheye is flat to 8.3e-6 per cent.
The horizon's shape belongs to the surface
The horizon is one great circle of directions whatever draws it, and at zero tilt all six named surfaces draw it straight. Tilt the camera and they separate — and the cylinder, not the equirectangular surface, is the one whose horizon is exactly a cosine, to 9e-16 against 8.3e-3.
A pole is a line
An equirectangular surface sends one direction to a whole edge, so an 8° cap of sky at the pole takes 4.50 per cent of the marks against a 0.49 per cent share of the world. The worst singularity is not the pole at all — the equidistant fisheye's antipode costs ×17.9 — and only the cube map, which never holds a sphere in one chart, is bounded.
The kink at a seam
A cube map is six flat pictures, so every great circle is drawn exactly straight inside a face — to 3e-15 of its chord — and breaks at the join. The break is a kink and not a bend, it is exactly zero at a seam's midpoint whatever the slant, and it is bounded by 2·atan(½) = 53.130° at the corner.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Picture surfaceAnisotropyCylindrical projectionFisheyeArea scalefield of viewConformalMatched surfaceScreenStereographicAngular sizeArcminute