Depth

Ladders

A field says what an essay is about. A ladder says what else there is to say about it — the distinct arguments that stand against one idea, from the one that introduces it to the one that assumes all the others.
eye, 74° offgrey: the word before the projectionblack: the same word, projected

Anamorphosis is only a viewpoint

A smear on a wall that resolves into a skull when the viewer stands in one particular place off to the side. It is not a trick added to perspective — it is perspective, with the centre of projection put somewhere nobody would naturally stand, and it is the clearest demonstration there is that every picture has such a point.

3 rungs · viewing
the panelhorizon — the centric point's heightthe section — the eye, the panel, the ground470 px — the viewing distancethree routes agree to 6e-14 pxsection, distance point, and a pinhole camera

Alberti draws a pavement, and chooses where the reader stands

The costruzione legittima of 1435 is exact. Run as a construction — with drawn rays and drawn intersections rather than the formula it turns out to satisfy — it agrees with a pinhole camera to six parts in a hundred trillion of a pixel. And it has one free parameter that the recipe never names, which is the distance from the eye to the panel.

2 rungs · construction
horizon — the eye's own heightbase — 0 mhorizon crossing — 1.62 mtop — 3.40 m recoveredthe vertical vanishing point is 8586 px above this framerecovered 3.400 m · true 3.400 m1.8 cm per pixel of click error

A height, out of one photograph

Four points on a vertical, one cross-ratio, and the height of something nobody measured. The only metric input is the photographer's own eye height, because the horizon is at eye level and that is the one piece of perspective folklore that is exactly true.

2 rungs · metrology
the picturethe same plane, rectifieddoor — 0.5068 widths (true 0.5068)sill — 0.3026 widths (true 0.3026)diagonal — 1.1766 widths (true 1.1766)worst error 4e-16 relativethe probes were not used to build the map

Flattening a façade out of the photograph

Four corners of a rectangle whose proportions are known are enough to undo the projection of one plane. After that the plane can be measured with a ruler — lengths, angles, areas, all of it — in units of the rectangle's own width, and lengths the map was never given come back to fifteen digits.

2 rungs · metrology
the picture, 160 mm wide22 cm40°the eyefocal length 948 px22 cm at 160 mm wide

The point you have to stand at

A perspective picture is a projection through a centre, and scaling that centre's distance to the width the picture is actually shown at gives a distance in centimetres. Shown 160 mm wide, a 40° picture is correct from 22 cm and a 90° one from 8 cm. Nobody stands there, and that single fact explains most of what gets called distortion.

2 rungs · viewing
flat picture plane — straight lines stay straightcylindrical picture surface — even stretch, bowed linesone scene, two picture surfacesneither is the distorted one

When the picture surface is not flat

A flat picture plane keeps straight lines straight and stretches the edges without bound. A cylindrical one spreads the stretch evenly and bends every straight line that is not through the axis. Neither is the distorted one — they are answers to different questions, and the choice decides what a wide view can be.

2 rungs · viewing
fitted conic: a circle to 1e-9stereographicdashed: the fit, not the samples

Stereographic keeps every angle, and only stereographic

One surface in the family preserves shape exactly — every right angle stays a right angle and both its arms are magnified equally, to the last bit the arithmetic has. It also sends every circle in the world to a circle in the picture, which the site's existing conic fit can be pointed at and asked to confirm without being told what it is looking at.

1 rung · curved
centre of the ellipseimage of the centrecorrect from 22 cm, at 160 mm wideoffset 21.1 px

The circle whose centre moves

The image of a circle is an ellipse, and the image of the circle's centre is not the centre of that ellipse. The gap is 3 or 4% of the ellipse's width in an ordinary view — large enough to see, small enough to be dismissed as a slip by anyone not expecting it, and the reason drawn wheels look wrong.

1 rung · foundations
horizonABCDon the groundin the picturelength AB1.00011.3930ratio AB:CD0.56670.6837cross-ratio1.31681.3168correct from 26 cm, at 160 mm wide34° across

What a projection destroys

A projection loses length, angle, area and the ratio in which a point divides a segment. Exactly one quantity comes through untouched, and almost everything that can be checked about a picture is checked with it — including, as it turns out, some things it cannot check at all.

1 rung · foundations
horizoncorner angles90.000° — forced by the methoddepicted side ratio0.7195lens this drawing implies60° acrossdrawn exactly as the method prescribesthe free step is where the far edges go

The cube that is a box

The two-point cube every book teaches has a step it supplies no construction for. Place the two far edges symmetrically and the drawing depicts a cube for free; place them eight points apart — a difference invisible on the page — and it depicts a box 1.4 times shallower than it is wide.

1 rung · wrong
fitted conic: 1.467 from being a circlecylinderthe samples, fitted

The cylinder, and the price of going all the way round

A cylindrical picture can hold three hundred and sixty degrees, keeps every vertical vertical, and bows every horizontal. Its cost is a stretch of sec φ in elevation, which is also the equirectangular surface's cost exactly — two surfaces that are always described as different and are identical in the one respect anybody notices.

1 rung · curved
horizonequal stepshalve thetaper byworst error, in metres of depthequal steps to the horizon11.72 mhalve the remaining gap225.13 mtaper by eye347.80 mcorrect from 26 cm, at 160 mm wide34° across

Dividing depth by eye

Three methods for spacing a receding row, all of them taught, all of them wrong. Read back as distances, the best misplaces a post by 3.5 metres in a row that is supposed to be spaced 1.4. And the obvious way of checking them gives one of the three a perfect score.

1 rung · wrong
horizon = eye level, 1.62 m91.01%correct from 26 cm, at 160 mm widespread 0

The horizon is at eye level — if the picture plane is vertical

The horizon cuts every standing figure at the same fraction of its height however far away it is, which is the most immediately usable fact in the subject. It holds when the camera is level, and a twelve-degree tilt is enough to spread the fractions by more than a percentage point.

1 rung · construction
02468020406080angle off the optical axis (degrees)area scale, relative to the centreplanecylinderstereographicequidistantequal-areaequirect.measured by differencing on the spherethe plane leaves the frame

Every fisheye is a different rule

The word "fisheye" names a shape of lens and not a projection. There are several, they disagree with each other by tens of per cent at the frame edge, and each is the right answer to a different question — one is a protractor, one is a counting instrument, one preserves shape. Which one a lens implements is a fact about that lens, and it is rarely printed on the barrel.

1 rung · curved
elevation0.0000two equalcabinet0.5000two equalcavalier1.0000all three equaldimetric0.4714all three differentisometric0.8165all three equaltrimetric0.5479all three differentsmallest of the three axis scalesmeasured from each projection

What isometric actually means

The three axis scales are equal to each other. They are not equal to one. Every unit along every axis is drawn at 0.8165 of its true length, which is √(2/3), and a great deal of confusion about isometric drawing comes from the word promising something it does not deliver.

1 rung · parallel
isometric — the limit2.5 m6 m20 m200 msame box, same drawn sizethe eye recedes

The eye taken to infinity

A parallel projection is a photograph from infinitely far away with the lens lengthened to match. That is not an analogy — it is the limit, it can be watched happening, and it explains why a long lens flattens a scene and why an isometric drawing has no viewing distance to state.

1 rung · parallel
24VPcorrect from 26 cm, at 160 mm wide34° across

The measuring point, and the step the method leaves out

Laying out equal depths correctly needs a second vanishing point that most treatments never introduce — the one belonging to the diagonals. With it the construction lands on the projected divisions to eighty femtopixels. Without it, depth is placed by judgement and the drawing depicts something nobody chose.

1 rung · construction
grey: the reflectiontwo routes, agreeing to 0e+0 px after one flip

A mirror is a second camera

Reflect the scene and photograph it, or reflect the camera and photograph the scene. The two routes disagree by 906 px and agree to 6 × 10⁻¹⁴ once one axis of the image is reversed — which is the whole of why a mirror is said to swap left and right, written down.

1 rung · light
no picture at 300°the plane is unbounded at 180°plane — bend 0.0%cylinder — bend 6.0%stereographic — bend 3.5%equidistant — bend 4.5%equal-area — bend 5.1%equirect. — bend 5.7%300° across in every panelsame scene, same angle, six surfaces

What a 360-degree photograph actually is

The format every spherical camera writes preserves nothing — not straightness, not shape, not area — and it is the right choice anyway, for a reason that has nothing to do with looking at it. An equirectangular file is a lookup table of directions, and the picture only exists at the moment something re-projects a piece of it.

1 rung · curved
elevationx 1.000y 1.000z 0.000cavalierx 1.000y 1.000z 1.000cabinetx 1.000y 1.000z 0.500isometricx 0.816y 0.816z 0.816dimetricx 0.943y 0.943z 0.471axis scales measured from the drawingall five preserve midpoints

Parallel projection is not primitive perspective

Isometric and oblique drawing are not what people used before they worked perspective out. They are a different answer to a different question, and the difference is one measurable quantity — a parallel projection preserves the ratio in which a point divides a segment, and a perspective projection destroys it by up to a quarter of the segment's length.

1 rung · parallel
horizon3 vanishing points at a finite distance2564 px · 8129 px · 531 px

One, two and three point are one construction

The names count how many vanishing points sit at a finite place in the picture, and the count is a fact about how the object is turned and the camera is aimed. Nothing about the method changes between them, and a vanishing point does not appear — it arrives from infinity.

1 rung · construction
recovered principal pointused to drawrecoveredgapfocal length853.90853.904e-15principal x345.0345.02e-12angle44.0°44.0°correct from 20 cm, at 160 mm wide44° across

Recovering the camera from the picture it drew

Draw a box from a known camera, forget the camera, and get it back from the twelve drawn edges alone. Agreement to one part in 10¹⁵ is a statement about the geometry, because the only thing that crossed between the two halves was a list of line segments.

1 rung · foundations
a room 2.8 m across, eye 1.6 m up1 mthe same plan, 137× bigger137 midenticalpicturesthe picture — both scenes, drawn twice, one on top of the otherlargest disagreement 1e-13 px over 8 verticesone length has to come from outside the picture

The one thing a single view cannot give

Make the world a hundred and thirty-seven times larger and move the eye a hundred and thirty-seven times further away, and the picture does not change by a measurable amount. Every ratio in a scene is recoverable from one photograph and no size is, and that is not a caveat about the method — it is the shape of the method.

1 rung · metrology
correct from 26 cm, at 160 mm wide34° across

A shadow is a second projection

The construction that puts a shadow on the ground is the construction that puts the scene on the picture plane, with the lamp where the eye was. Shadow drawing is taught as a separate set of recipes and it is one operation with the centre moved, which is why the same code draws both.

1 rung · light
horizonshadows meet at x = -58, off the frameon the horizon, as it must be

Where shadows vanish

The shadows of parallel posts under the sun meet at a point, and that point must lie on the horizon. Under a lamp they meet at the lamp's foot instead. Both are checkable in any photograph, and a picture whose shadows fail the check was not lit by anything.

1 rung · light
horizon — the image of the line at infinityvanishing point at x = 1464 — off the framecorrect from 26 cm, at 160 mm wide34° across

Where parallel lines meet

They meet at a point that is not in the plane, and the horizon is the line made of all such points. Treating that as bookkeeping misses what it buys — a vanishing point becomes an ordinary point of the picture, findable from the drawn lines, checkable, and enterable into any calculation the others are.

1 rung · foundations
54 px69 px84° across27% wider at the edge

Wide angle is not distortion

A wide lens stretches shapes at the edge of the frame by exactly 1/cos θ — 3% at 28° across, 41% at 90°. Every bit of that is what a correct rectilinear projection must do, and every bit of it disappears if the picture is viewed from the point it was made for. Nobody views it from there.

1 rung · viewing

All essays