field of view — where it appears
Named by 42 essays across 12 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The point you have to stand at
A perspective picture is a projection through a centre, and scaling that centre's distance to the width the picture is actually shown at gives a distance in centimetres. Shown 160 mm wide, a 40° picture is correct from 22 cm and a 90° one from 8 cm. Nobody stands there, and that single fact explains most of what gets called distortion.
What the removed roof buys
The Japanese convention of drawing an interior with its roof lifted off is usually explained as a way of seeing inside. What it actually buys is uniformity — every room reports the same share of its floor, to the last sample, where the eye that frames the same building reports three different numbers.
A focal length is not an angle
Fifty millimetres means nothing until a rectangle is named behind it. The same lens is 39.6° across full frame, 26.6° across APS-C and 8.7° across a phone sensor — and the distance the resulting print is correct from depends on the ratio of the two, so two cameras matched on angle agree exactly whatever their formats.
The screen sets the distance
Every viewing distance quoted for a picture on a page is conditional on an assumed figure width. Replace the assumption with an actual chain — focal length, sensor width, display width — and the same 50 mm frame is correct from 9 cm on a phone, 83 cm on a monitor and 16.7 m in a cinema. Nobody is standing at any of them.
The cylinder, and the price of going all the way round
A cylindrical picture can hold three hundred and sixty degrees, keeps every vertical vertical, and bows every horizontal. Its cost is a stretch of sec φ in elevation, which is also the equirectangular surface's cost exactly — two surfaces that are always described as different and are identical in the one respect anybody notices.
Wide angle is not distortion
A wide lens stretches shapes at the edge of the frame by exactly 1/cos θ — 3% at 28° across, 41% at 90°. Every bit of that is what a correct rectilinear projection must do, and every bit of it disappears if the picture is viewed from the point it was made for. Nobody views it from there.
Stepping closer is not zooming
Changing the focal length leaves the ratio between any two things in a picture exactly alone — to twelve decimal places, at every focal length there is. Moving changes it. Hold the subject's drawn size across a step from 3 m to 1.5 m and the background halves, which is the whole of the shot everybody knows and nobody derives.
A wide field on a small screen
A picture rendered at a hundred degrees and shown on a screen that subtends forty-nine is being read from two and a half times its own station distance, so the depicted space is two and a half times too deep. The stretch at the edges everybody complains about is correct; the complaint is really that nobody is sitting where it would be invisible.
Stereographic keeps every angle, and only stereographic
One surface in the family preserves shape exactly — every right angle stays a right angle and both its arms are magnified equally, to the last bit the arithmetic has. It also sends every circle in the world to a circle in the picture, which the site's existing conic fit can be pointed at and asked to confirm without being told what it is looking at.
The sixty-degree cone of vision
Every book says keep the subject inside a 60° cone. Measured, the marginal stretch the rule is nominally about is exactly zero from the station point — 1.000000000000 to 1, over 720 sampled points. The rule is a statement about the reader, and books do not obey it.
Every fisheye is a different rule
The word "fisheye" names a shape of lens and not a projection. There are several, they disagree with each other by tens of per cent at the frame edge, and each is the right answer to a different question — one is a protractor, one is a counting instrument, one preserves shape. Which one a lens implements is a fact about that lens, and it is rarely printed on the barrel.
The render is distorted on purpose
A headset renders a bent picture so its lens can straighten it, which is a lens's distortion polynomial run backwards, and the one case in which distortion is introduced deliberately. The round trip closes to a thousandth of a millionth of a pixel, and the price is that one rendered pixel becomes 0.493 delivered pixels at the edge of the field and one at the centre.
A mirror ball is an equal-area fisheye
Photograph a mirror ball from far enough away and its rule is ρ = R·sin(θ/2), which is the equal-area fisheye — not an approximation to it, the rule. Measured, the departure falls from 4.27% of the picture's radius at 3 radii to 0.01% at 2000, while the next-best named rule stays 21% out at every distance. And the ball reflects 100.0% of the directions there are, which no designed surface does.
The port that is not there
A flat window into water costs a lens a third of its field. A sphere centred on the entrance pupil costs nothing at all — not nearly nothing, exactly nothing — and six millimetres off centre costs 0.635°.
Both vanishing points on the paper
Putting the two vanishing points on the sheet is presented as a composition rule. It is a statement about the reader: with the two points one page-width apart the picture is a 90° view, correct from 80 mm, and a reader holding it at arm's length is shown a room five times as deep as the one drawn. The layout that is honest at arm's length puts both points four and a half pages off the sheet.
The arcs a curvilinear drawing uses
The taught way to draw a very wide view by hand is to run every straight edge of the world as a circular arc. That recipe has been repeated for sixty years without a surface attached to it, and it turns out to name one exactly — fitting a general conic to the image of a straight line returns a circle to nine decimal places under stereographic projection and returns nothing like a circle under any of the other standard picture surfaces.
One parameter between two surfaces
Wide architectural views are usually made on a projection with a number attached to it — a family running from the flat plane at one end toward the cylinder at the other, with everybody using the value one. That value has never been given a geometric defence. Measured across the family with the same battery of tests as every other surface, the worst angular error over the field has a minimum, and the minimum is at 1.04.
A wall does not get darker as it goes away
The inverse square law is about a point source. A surface is not a point source, and the picture of a wall is exactly as bright at twenty metres as at two — the patch one pixel covers grows as the square of the distance and the light per unit area falls as the square of the distance, and a picture records the product. Which is why aerial perspective has to be the air.
Conformal is not undistorted
The most distorted-looking picture in ordinary circulation is the little planet — a 360 photograph re-projected from below, with the ground curled into a ball. Its worst angular error over 160 degrees of the sphere is 4.4e-8 degrees, which is arithmetic noise. Every crossing in the original crosses at exactly the same angle in the result, and what has gone is area, over a factor of 255.
A barrel model folds at a radius it sets itself
The polynomial every calibration fits to a wide lens stops increasing at a radius fixed by its own first coefficient — 47.49° of field at k₁ = −0.28 — and past it two directions land on one picture radius. The routine that undistorts pictures with it does not refuse there. It hands back wrong directions from 46.75°, by as much as 106.5°, and refuses only at 65.5°: a fifth of the field returned silently wrong.
Six flat pictures of everything
There is one way to photograph the whole sphere and keep every straight line straight, and it is to stop using one surface. Six flat pictures at ninety degrees cover everything, each of them a perfect pinhole, and the price is paid entirely at the seams — where a straight line does not bend but kinks, by an angle that reaches 45 degrees and is exactly zero for the lines lying in the seam's own plane.
The corner sees an ellipse
A circular pupil viewed from off the axis is foreshortened by the cosine, so the blur patch a corner receives is an ellipse of axis ratio 0.920 at the edge of a full-frame picture with a 50 mm lens — and the light through it falls as the fourth power of the same cosine, 0.480 stops. Both are geometry, both happen to a perfect lens, and no design removes either.
A narrow view keeps a second answer, inside out
Six pictures of a courtyard through a 3° field, every mark exact. Started from the scene turned inside out, the adjustment settles there — near points far, far points near — and misfits the marks by under a pixel. The misfit grows in proportion to the field and to the sweep of the cameras, and vanishes only where perspective does.
Focusing is a zoom
A 50 mm lens focused at half a metre is not a 50 mm camera. It stands 55.56 mm from the sensor, its picture is a pinhole picture at that distance, and it covers 35.9° where the same lens at infinity covers 39.6°. Recover the camera from the picture and it reports 55.56 mm. Read the picture with the engraved 50 mm instead and a right angle comes back as 96.0°.
The evenness a curve buys
A curved screen is sold on evenness, and evenness turns out to be three quantities that disagree. On pixel pitch the curve wins from every seat; on the angle the glass is turned through it wins until three and a half metres along the sofa; on the plain distance from eye to glass — the reading the argument is usually made in — it gives up before half a metre.
The minor axis is not the axle
A wheel's perspective ellipse is supposed to have its short axis along the axle, and it does — on the principal ray, to 5e-14 degrees, and nowhere else. Off it the two part by 5.95 degrees on an ordinary frame while the drawn curves stay 0.98 px apart. A sphere obeys a rule of exactly the same shape and obeys it everywhere, which is why nobody caught the difference.
A model that inverts has a horizon instead of a fold
The polynomial every calibration fits turns around at a finite radius and stops being a map from direction to picture. The division model, chosen because it inverts in closed form, never turns around — it rises for ever toward a horizon at one over the root of its own coefficient, so the whole hemisphere of directions lands inside a finite disc. Fitted to the four fisheye laws it follows every one of them more closely than the polynomial at every field from forty degrees to eighty — a hundred times more closely for the equidistant law at forty, and the stereographic law exactly.
A dolly zoom is a step and a zoom, and they meet at one depth
Step 1.5 m toward a subject 5 m away while shortening the lens to hold its size. Every mark moves along the line from the centre of the picture, to a ten-trillionth of a degree — outward if nearer than the subject, inward toward a limit if further, and not at all on the subject's own plane. The step and the zoom each move everything one way; the dolly zoom is where they cancel.
A start needs the sign of its depths, not their size
Started part of the way from a courtyard toward its inside-out twin, a bundle adjustment returns to the truth from every start less than 42 per cent of the way — a start with a sixth of the true relief, the right way round — and falls into the twin from every start past 56. Between, neighbouring starts settle in different answers. The band sits in the same place at a 3° field, where the twin misfits by under a pixel, and at 25°, where it misfits by seven and a half.
The cameras decide where a narrow view settles
Scatter a narrow-field bundle adjustment's starting depths and the answer it reaches stops following them: of eighty scattered starts whose depths had the right sign, twenty-six fell into the inside-out twin, and of a hundred with the wrong sign, forty-three came home. Split the start in two and the reason is plain. With the cameras where they are, the courtyard comes home from its own inside-out points; with the cameras on the twin's side, it falls in from the true ones.
The parallax you cannot shoot away
A stitched panorama's parallax has two halves and they do not behave alike. The one across the seam falls as the sine of half a frame spacing, so more frames buy it off; the one up the frame is the sine of half the frame's own height, and no quantity of shooting touches it. They cross at π over β, which has no pivot error in it at all.
Closer than they appear, by a factor with a number in it
A wing mirror of one metre radius held eighty centimetres from the eye reports 1.30 metres for an object at sixty-four, because the image of anything distant sits half a radius behind the glass. The size such an object subtends reads as a distance 2.60 times the true one, and the factor is exactly one plus twice the eye's distance over the radius — so the warning is a number, and it is larger for the mirror that is further away.
A dolly zoom off the axis keeps a line, not a plane
Step toward a subject along a track that is not quite the line of sight, and zoom to hold its size, and the plane that stood still in the classic shot stops standing still. The step now spreads from a point beside the centre while the zoom still shrinks toward the centre, and the two cancel only along one row of the picture, one depth per column. The subject itself slides by f·d·sin ψ over its distance — a pixel once the track is a quarter of a degree out — and turning to follow it holds the subject at the price of bending the rest of its plane, while shifting the frame instead holds the whole plane exactly.
A stereographic fisheye is a division model
The division model divides the picture radius by one plus a coefficient times its square. The fits that compared it with the polynomial were not of that model: they multiplied instead, and the model they measured has neither a fold nor a horizon. Fitted as it is written, the division model follows every fisheye law more closely than the polynomial at every field from forty degrees, and the stereographic law it follows exactly — the law is the model, with a coefficient of minus a quarter. Its horizon then turns out to sit beyond the lens's own ninety degrees, and pinning it there is a trade rather than a free constraint.
A frame's shear knows travel only over depth
Read a frame row by row while the camera turns and travels, and every vertical post leans — the near ones more. The lean is the turn plus the travel over the post's depth, and that sum is all the frame holds: twice the travel past posts twice as far draws the same frame to eighteen decimal places. Two posts cannot separate turn from travel. A facade can, because a turn leans the edges of the frame more than its middle, but the two signals are 99.8 per cent alike, and reading them apart takes a pixel on every row.
The ball at the edge of the frame
A ball photographed near the edge of a wide picture is not drawn as a circle. It is an ellipse, longer along the radius from the centre of the picture than across it, and the centre of that ellipse is not the image of the centre of the ball. Both are properties of the flat sheet the picture is on, and an exact pinhole produces both.
Where a surface spends its pixels
A picture surface is a budget before it is anything else, and the six named ones distribute the same marks over the same directions quite differently. The flat plane lays 25.0 times as many on a square degree at the edge of a 70° field as on one at the centre; the equal-area fisheye is flat to 8.3e-6 per cent.
The horizon's shape belongs to the surface
The horizon is one great circle of directions whatever draws it, and at zero tilt all six named surfaces draw it straight. Tilt the camera and they separate — and the cylinder, not the equirectangular surface, is the one whose horizon is exactly a cosine, to 9e-16 against 8.3e-3.
The kink at a seam
A cube map is six flat pictures, so every great circle is drawn exactly straight inside a face — to 3e-15 of its chord — and breaks at the join. The break is a kink and not a bend, it is exactly zero at a seam's midpoint whatever the slant, and it is bounded by 2·atan(½) = 53.130° at the corner.
Shot on one surface, shown on another
Two picture surfaces are two charts of the same pencil of rays, so a reprojection between them is a change of coordinates and loses no geometry at all — bit-exact at all 408 sampled directions. What it costs lies elsewhere — 70 per cent of the source has nowhere to go, and the target wants ×5.49 the marks at its edge.
Which rule a fisheye obeys, from straightness alone
Four candidate rules for a fisheye lens part by 54.0 per cent at 45° off axis, and a plumb-line fit shown no scene, no camera and no calibration target can still name which one took a photograph — reliably from about 45° of half-field. Below that the four are indistinguishable in the marks, and naming one collapses to guessing.
A projector that is not at the dome's centre
A projector 0.40 of a dome's radius off centre puts its own picture up to 23.6 degrees from where it belongs, and the pre-warp that corrects it is exact for one seat and only one. Two metres from that seat costs 11.5 degrees of the same displacement, wherever the projector itself stands — because the correction never knew where the projector was in the first place.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
DemonstrationArea scalePicture surfaceViewing distanceAnisotropyFocal lengthStation pointFisheyeinstrument limitCamera calibrationEquirectangularPicture plane