Visual Plane
every picture states the point it is correct from
Concept

Focal length — where it appears

19 essays name this object, across 10 fields. What follows is each of them, and the objects they name alongside it.
the picture, 160 mm wide22 cm40°the eyefocal length 948 px22 cm at 160 mm wide

The point you have to stand at

A perspective picture is a projection through a centre, and scaling that centre's distance to the width the picture is actually shown at gives a distance in centimetres. Shown 160 mm wide, a 40° picture is correct from 22 cm and a 90° one from 8 cm. Nobody stands there, and that single fact explains most of what gets called distortion.

viewing · station horizoncorner angles90.000° — forced by the methoddepicted side ratio0.7195lens this drawing implies60° acrossdrawn exactly as the method prescribesthe free step is where the far edges go

The cube that is a box

The two-point cube every book teaches has a step it supplies no construction for. Place the two far edges symmetrically and the drawing depicts a cube for free; place them eight points apart — a difference invisible on the page — and it depicts a box 1.4 times shallower than it is wide.

wrong · cubebyeye principal pointk₁ = -0.320, k₂ = 0.110 — barrel distortioncentre line 0e+0 px of sag, outermost 17.8 px

Straight lines that are not

Everybody says the edges of a wide-angle frame bow. Nothing is special about the edge. A radial map moves every point along its own radius, so the only line it leaves straight is one through the principal point, and the bend of every other is decided by how far it passes from that one place.

lens · distortion epipoleepipoleleft pictureright pictureepipole from 44 correspondences vs the projected eye: 1.1e-9 px2.60 m between the eyes

The image of the other eye

Two photographs of one courtyard, and in each of them a point that is the other camera. It is computed from forty-four matched marks and nothing else, and it lands on the projection of the other eye to about a billionth of a pixel.

twoviews · epipole 025507510010203040true depth (m)depth reported from the disparity, with a 1 px reading error5.86–7.33 m13.96–26.69 m23.76–126.49 mat 40 m: +86.5 m against −16.2 munbounded past 58.5 m

Depth is a reciprocal

Two eyes measure a shift in the picture, and depth is that shift divided into a constant. So a fixed error in what is read maps to an interval in what is reported that is not centred on the answer, and at forty metres runs sixteen metres nearer and eighty-six further.

depth · disparity 246VPcorrect from 26 cm, at 160 mm wide34° across

The measuring point, and the step the method leaves out

Laying out equal depths correctly needs a second vanishing point that most treatments never introduce — the one belonging to the diagonals. With it the construction lands on the projected divisions to eighty femtopixels. Without it, depth is placed by judgement and the drawing depicts something nobody chose.

construction · measuring 00.50011.502-0.400-0.20000.200k₁departure of the cross-ratio from the world's value (%)pinhole1.29%the pinhole's own error, on the same four points2e-16 — the control

A lens destroys the invariant

The cross-ratio is the one thing a projection preserves, and everything checkable on this site is checked with it. A lens returns it one and a third per cent out where the pinhole is exact to fifteen digits — and the height error that follows tracks a quantity nobody would guess.

lens · distortion 123-2-10baseline (m, log scale)range past which 1 px of disparity error is unbounded (m, log scale)65 mm → 58.5 mrange = fB/δ — 58.5 m at a 65 mm baseline900 px focal length, 1 px reading

The range a pair cannot see past

A stereo rig has a distance beyond which it cannot say "no further than", and the distance is fixed before anything is built. It is the focal length times the baseline divided by the reading precision, and for a human pair of eyes it is fifty-eight and a half metres.

depth · disparity recovered principal pointused to drawrecoveredgapfocal length853.90853.904e-15principal x345.0345.02e-12angle44.0°44.0°—correct from 20 cm, at 160 mm wide44° across

Recovering the camera from the picture it drew

Draw a box from a known camera, forget the camera, and get it back from the twelve drawn edges alone. Agreement to one part in 10¹⁵ is a statement about the geometry, because the only thing that crossed between the two halves was a list of line segments.

foundations · recovery fitted k₁ = -0.280000true -0.280000, off by 5e-15

Fitting a lens from straightness alone

No calibration target, no known scene, no camera. Only the knowledge that some edges in the picture were straight — and the coefficient comes back to fifteen digits. Then it comes back with a companion, and the two are correlated at −0.997.

lens · plumbline no single viewpoint — the rays miss by 4.5 px, depth-dependentf recovered from it: 396.88 px

What survives a pane of glass

A slab of glass moves every point of a picture and moves no direction at all. So the camera recovered from a photograph taken through a display case is exactly the camera that took it — out of a picture in which nothing is where it was.

refraction · slab the panelhorizon — the centric point's heightthe section — the eye, the panel, the ground470 px — the viewing distancethree routes agree to 6e-14 pxsection, distance point, and a pinhole camera

Alberti draws a pavement, and chooses where the reader stands

The costruzione legittima of 1435 is exact. Run as a construction — with drawn rays and drawn intersections rather than the formula it turns out to satisfy — it agrees with a pinhole camera to six parts in a hundred trillion of a pixel. And it has one free parameter that the recipe never names, which is the distance from the eye to the panel.

construction · alberti 02468020406080angle off the optical axis (degrees)area scale, relative to the centreplanecylinderstereographicequidistantequal-areaequirect.measured by differencing on the spherethe plane leaves the frame

Every fisheye is a different rule

The word "fisheye" names a shape of lens and not a projection. There are several, they disagree with each other by tens of per cent at the frame edge, and each is the right answer to a different question — one is a protractor, one is a counting instrument, one preserves shape. Which one a lens implements is a fact about that lens, and it is rarely printed on the barrel.

curved · fisheye a room 2.8 m across, eye 1.6 m up1 mthe same plan, 137× bigger137 midenticalpicturesthe picture — both scenes, drawn twice, one on top of the otherlargest disagreement 1e-13 px over 8 verticesone length has to come from outside the picture

The one thing a single view cannot give

Make the world a hundred and thirty-seven times larger and move the eye a hundred and thirty-seven times further away, and the picture does not change by a measurable amount. Every ratio in a scene is recoverable from one photograph and no size is, and that is not a caveat about the method — it is the shape of the method.

metrology · scale level — the top is cut off0.00° of spreadtilted 13°4.55° of spreadshifted 95 px0.00° of spreada shift moves every point by exactly the shift95.0 px, and no direction at all

The principal point is not the centre

Every textbook that computes a focal length from two vanishing points supplies the middle of the frame as the principal point. On a shifted or cropped picture that is wrong, and it costs one and a half per cent of the answer at a fifth of a frame's shift.

lens · shift centric pointdistance point, 12 px off the sheet →430 pxcorrect from 10 cm at 160 mm wide47° across

The distance point is the viewing distance, drawn

There is exactly one place in the whole classical apparatus where the distance from the eye to the picture appears as a length on the page, and it is the offset from the centric point to the distance point. Everything this site exists to compute was drawn in the fifteenth century, on the horizon, and nobody said what it was.

construction · alberti no picture at 300°the plane is unbounded at 180°plane — bend 0.0%cylinder — bend 6.0%stereographic — bend 3.5%equidistant — bend 4.5%equal-area — bend 5.1%equirect. — bend 5.7%300° across in every panelsame scene, same angle, six surfaces

What a 360-degree photograph actually is

The format every spherical camera writes preserves nothing — not straightness, not shape, not area — and it is the right choice anyway, for a reason that has nothing to do with looking at it. An equirectangular file is a lookup table of directions, and the picture only exists at the moment something re-projects a piece of it.

curved · panorama the far field — where the stitch was fitted2.2 m — 3.2 px out24 m — 0.3 px outthe sky registers to 1e-13 pxthe foreground does not — up to 3.2 px

The eye is a place, not a point

Rotate a camera about the wrong point and the sky still stitches perfectly while the foreground slides. The misregistration falls as one over the distance, exactly — which is what says the fault is the pivot and not the lens.

lens · pupil the picture — identical at every viewing distanceplan: the true cube, and the solid depicteddepth × 2.12, width × 1.00correct from 18.8 cm at 160 mm wideread from 40 cm — depth × 2.12

Standing in the wrong place

A picture read from twice the distance it is correct from depicts a scene twice as deep — and not one mark on the paper moves. The error is invisible in the picture, which is why it survives everywhere.

viewing · station

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Vanishing pointPrincipal pointViewing distanceResidualHorizonPicture planeStation pointBaselineCamera calibrationCentric pointMeasuring pointsingle-view metrology

All concepts