Visual Plane
every picture states the point it is correct from
Theme

The thread: What a projection destroys

Length goes, angle goes, area goes, and the ratio in which a point divides a segment goes. Knowing precisely what is lost is what makes the one surviving quantity worth anything, so the losses are measured alongside it rather than mentioned.
horizonABCDon the groundin the picturelength AB1.00011.3930ratio AB:CD0.56670.6837cross-ratio1.31681.3168correct from 26 cm, at 160 mm wide34° across What survives

What a projection destroys

A projection loses length, angle, area and the ratio in which a point divides a segment. Exactly one quantity comes through untouched, and almost everything that can be checked about a picture is checked with it — including, as it turns out, some things it cannot check at all.

 elevationx 1.000y 1.000z 0.000cavalierx 1.000y 1.000z 1.000cabinetx 1.000y 1.000z 0.500isometricx 0.816y 0.816z 0.816dimetricx 0.943y 0.943z 0.471axis scales measured from the drawingall five preserve midpoints The other systems

Parallel projection is not primitive perspective

Isometric and oblique drawing are not what people used before they worked perspective out. They are a different answer to a different question, and the difference is one measurable quantity — a parallel projection preserves the ratio in which a point divides a segment, and a perspective projection destroys it by up to a quarter of the segment's length.

 elevation0.0000two equalcabinet0.5000two equalcavalier1.0000all three equaldimetric0.4714all three differentisometric0.8165all three equaltrimetric0.5479all three differentsmallest of the three axis scalesmeasured from each projection The other systems

What isometric actually means

The three axis scales are equal to each other. They are not equal to one. Every unit along every axis is drawn at 0.8165 of its true length, which is √(2/3), and a great deal of confusion about isometric drawing comes from the word promising something it does not deliver.

 horizonequal stepshalve thetaper byworst error, in metres of depthequal steps to the horizon11.72 mhalve the remaining gap225.13 mtaper by eye347.80 mcorrect from 26 cm, at 160 mm wide34° across Drawn confidently

Dividing depth by eye

Three methods for spacing a receding row, all of them taught, all of them wrong. Read back as distances, the best misplaces a post by 3.5 metres in a row that is supposed to be spaced 1.4. And the obvious way of checking them gives one of the three a perfect score.

 centre of the ellipseimage of the centrecorrect from 22 cm, at 160 mm wideoffset 21.1 px What survives

The circle whose centre moves

The image of a circle is an ellipse, and the image of the circle's centre is not the centre of that ellipse. The gap is 3 or 4% of the ellipse's width in an ordinary view — large enough to see, small enough to be dismissed as a slip by anyone not expecting it, and the reason drawn wheels look wrong.

All themes