Depth

Ladders — page 3

A field says what an essay is about. A ladder says what else there is to say about it — the distinct arguments that stand against one idea, from the one that introduces it to the one that assumes all the others.
the far field — where the stitch was fitted2.2 m — 3.2 px out24 m — 0.3 px outthe sky registers to 1e-13 pxthe foreground does not — up to 3.2 px

The eye is a place, not a point

Rotate a camera about the wrong point and the sky still stitches perfectly while the foreground slides. The misregistration falls as one over the distance, exactly — which is what says the fault is the pivot and not the lens.

1 rung · lens
recovered principal pointused to drawrecoveredgapfocal length853.90853.904e-15principal x345.0345.02e-12angle44.0°44.0°correct from 20 cm, at 160 mm wide44° across

Recovering the camera from the picture it drew

Draw a box from a known camera, forget the camera, and get it back from the twelve drawn edges alone. Agreement to one part in 10¹⁵ is a statement about the geometry, because the only thing that crossed between the two halves was a list of line segments.

1 rung · foundations
water, n = 1.333eyetruly 1.50 m downappears 0.818 m downh/n would be 1.125 mno single viewpoint — the rays miss by 17.1° of bend at the surfaceapparent depth 54.5% of the true one, not 75.0%

What a ray does at a surface

A pool looks three-quarters as deep as it is — but only if you look straight down. At sixty degrees the same bottom appears at half its depth, and at eighty at a fifth, which is why the far end of a pool looks shallow enough to walk in.

1 rung · refraction
correct from 26 cm, at 160 mm wide34° across

A shadow is a second projection

The construction that puts a shadow on the ground is the construction that puts the scene on the picture plane, with the lamp where the eye was. Shadow drawing is taught as a separate set of recipes and it is one operation with the centre moved, which is why the same code draws both.

1 rung · light
horizonshadows meet at x = -58, off the frameon the horizon, as it must be

Where shadows vanish

The shadows of parallel posts under the sun meet at a point, and that point must lie on the horizon. Under a lamp they meet at the lamp's foot instead. Both are checkable in any photograph, and a picture whose shadows fail the check was not lit by anything.

1 rung · light
level — the top is cut off0.00° of spreadtilted 13°4.55° of spreadshifted 95 px0.00° of spreada shift moves every point by exactly the shift95.0 px, and no direction at all

The principal point is not the centre

Every textbook that computes a focal length from two vanishing points supplies the middle of the frame as the principal point. On a shifted or cropped picture that is wrong, and it costs one and a half per cent of the answer at a fifth of a frame's shift.

1 rung · lens
no single viewpoint — the rays miss by 4.5 px, depth-dependentf recovered from it: 396.88 px

What survives a pane of glass

A slab of glass moves every point of a picture and moves no direction at all. So the camera recovered from a photograph taken through a display case is exactly the camera that took it — out of a picture in which nothing is where it was.

1 rung · refraction
15°30°45°60°85°the rim: 48.61° from straight upbeyond it: the bottom, reflected45° of sky0.469460° of sky0.370275° of sky0.211485° of sky0.0738area scalen = 1.333, so the rim is at asin(1/n) = 48.61°area scale 0.563 at the centre, 0.0738 at 85°

The sky inside a cone

From under water the whole sky — every direction out to the horizon — arrives inside a cone of 48.61°. Outside it the surface is a mirror. That cone is a picture surface, and it has a distortion no surface in the curved field has — an area scale that runs to zero.

1 rung · refraction
-2.80-2.6034567number of viewsworst camera-centre error (fraction of the track's mean radius, log scale)7 flat7 flat7 flat7 flat7 flat60° sweep, filled in12° per view, wideningfilled in: 1.1e-3 → 2.0e-3widened: 3.2e-3 → 1.8e-3

Another picture of the same sweep

Going from three views to seven across the same sixty degrees leaves the reconstruction exactly where it started, and at one point makes it worse. What a reconstruction is short of is angular spread, not photographs.

1 rung · manyviews
midpoint — 2.77 mm gapfrom the left eyefrom the right eyegap 2.77 mm at 7.22 mexact marks: 2.2e-16 m

Two rays that do not meet

Triangulation is described everywhere as the intersection of two rays, and two rays in space do not intersect. Read the same two marks to a whole pixel and they miss by 2.77 mm at seven metres, which is a real length and is the part a residual will not report.

1 rung · depth
horizon — the image of the line at infinityvanishing point at x = 1464 — off the framecorrect from 26 cm, at 160 mm wide34° across

Where parallel lines meet

They meet at a point that is not in the plane, and the horizon is the line made of all such points. Treating that as bookkeeping misses what it buys — a vanishing point becomes an ordinary point of the picture, findable from the drawn lines, checkable, and enterable into any calculation the others are.

1 rung · foundations
54 px69 px84° across27% wider at the edge

Wide angle is not distortion

A wide lens stretches shapes at the edge of the frame by exactly 1/cos θ — 3% at 28° across, 41% at 90°. Every bit of that is what a correct rectilinear projection must do, and every bit of it disappears if the picture is viewed from the point it was made for. Nobody views it from there.

1 rung · viewing

All essays