Series

Lightrecovery — the series

5 essays on one idea, from the one that introduces it to the one that assumes the rest.
  1. the shadow lines meet below the horizon — a lamp in the roomhorizoncorrect from 25 cm, at 160 mm wide3 posts · foot 351 px below the horizon

    The lamp, out of the picture

    Two posts and their shadows put the light's position in a photograph, exactly, with nothing given but the drawn lines and the camera's own horizon. Two posts. One gives a residual of zero and an answer that is a whole one-parameter family — the sharpest counter-example there is to the idea that a small residual means a right answer, met again in a new field.

    part 4 · light
  2. 05010015020011.502log₁₀ of the lamp's distance (m)pixels the recovered foot sits below the horizonthe sun: on the horizonthe recovered height stays exactwhat falls off is the evidence that the light is finite

    A light far enough away

    The evidence in a photograph that its light is in the room rather than at infinity is one number — how far below the horizon the shadow lines put the light's foot. It falls off as one over the distance, from 211 px at 4 m to 10.8 px at 266 m, while the recovered height stays exact to 5e-13 of itself. What fails first is not the arithmetic; it is the evidence, and one pixel of error costs 0.21 mm of height at the near end and 0.07 m at the far one.

    part 5 · light
  3. 05010000.0500.1000.1500.200how strongly the floor disheshow far the recovered foot is from the lamp's (px)the foot, found in the planthe lamp, found in rays — exactthree posts on a dished floor, one drawing133 cm of lamp at k = 0.22

    The lamp comes out in rays and not in plan

    One drawing of three posts and their shadows yields two points, and a curved floor treats them completely differently. The lines through each post's top and its shadow's tip meet at the lamp's image to a ten-thousandth of a pixel at every curvature, because a top and a tip are two points of one real ray. The lines through each foot and the same tips meet 113 pixels from the lamp's foot — and the lamp placed from an exact point and a wrong one lands 1.3 metres away.

    part 6 · light
  4. how clearly each line belongs to one pencil2 lamps, 5 posts251.5 px100% assigned right3 lamps, 5 posts12.1 px73% assigned right4 lamps, 5 posts38.6 px40% assigned right0.5 px of clicking, lamps spread over 2 mthe counting of unknowns cannot see this

    The drawing does not run out of lines

    Every post supplies a line to every lamp, so a drawing of five posts offers ten lines to two lamps and twenty to four — the unknowns and the constraints grow together and two posts fix any number of lights. What runs out is the partition, whose margin falls from 251 pixels to six as the share of lines assigned correctly falls from all to just over half.

    part 7 · light
  5. horizonwhere the rays meet — the reversed imagecorrect from 19 cm, at 160 mm widethe lamp has no image · rays meet to 2e-13 px

    A lamp behind the camera

    A light behind the photographer has no image — the projection refuses it — and the shadows it casts are in front of them, drawn as ordinary shadows. The construction that recovers a lamp from those shadows works anyway, meeting to a ten-thousandth of a pixel at the point the reversed divide puts it, and the taught reading of where the answer lies gets the case exactly backwards.

    part 8 · light

All series