Depth

Ladders — page 2

A field says what an essay is about. A ladder says what else there is to say about it — the distinct arguments that stand against one idea, from the one that introduces it to the one that assumes all the others.
246VPcorrect from 26 cm, at 160 mm wide34° across

The measuring point, and the step the method leaves out

Laying out equal depths correctly needs a second vanishing point that most treatments never introduce — the one belonging to the diagonals. With it the construction lands on the projected divisions to eighty femtopixels. Without it, depth is placed by judgement and the drawing depicts something nobody chose.

1 rung · construction
grey: the reflectiontwo routes, agreeing to 0e+0 px after one flip

A mirror is a second camera

Reflect the scene and photograph it, or reflect the camera and photograph the scene. The two routes disagree by 315 px and agree to the last bit once one axis of the image is reversed — which is the whole of why a mirror is said to swap left and right, written down.

1 rung · light
the water surfacethe pinholethe rays miss by 9.9 mmno single viewpoint — the rays miss by 9.9 mmdry control: 0e+0 m

A picture through water has no viewpoint

Continue the rays of a refracted picture into the water and fit them to a common point. They miss it by ten millimetres. The same fit with the water taken away misses by zero, which is what makes ten millimetres a measurement rather than a number.

1 rung · refraction
no picture at 300°the plane is unbounded at 180°plane — bend 0.0%cylinder — bend 6.0%stereographic — bend 3.5%equidistant — bend 4.5%equal-area — bend 5.1%equirect. — bend 5.7%300° across in every panelsame scene, same angle, six surfaces

What a 360-degree photograph actually is

The format every spherical camera writes preserves nothing — not straightness, not shape, not area — and it is the right choice anyway, for a reason that has nothing to do with looking at it. An equirectangular file is a lookup table of directions, and the picture only exists at the moment something re-projects a piece of it.

1 rung · curved
elevationx 1.000y 1.000z 0.000cavalierx 1.000y 1.000z 1.000cabinetx 1.000y 1.000z 0.500isometricx 0.816y 0.816z 0.816dimetricx 0.943y 0.943z 0.471axis scales measured from the drawingall 5 preserve midpoints

Parallel projection is not primitive perspective

Isometric and oblique drawing are not what people used before they worked perspective out. They are a different answer to a different question, and the difference is one measurable quantity — a parallel projection preserves the ratio in which a point divides a segment, and a perspective projection destroys it by 7% of the segment's drawn length at a comfortable depth, rising to 13% over the range the slider covers.

1 rung · parallel
source, 35 cmthe occluder's edgefraction of the source visiblepenumbra 17.5 cmprojection: 17.50 cmsampled: 17.41 cm

The penumbra is the lamp's image

The soft edge of a shadow is a picture of the light, projected through the occluder's edge as through a pinhole. That gives its width without any integration — and it is why the dapples under a tree go crescent-shaped during an eclipse.

1 rung · light
fitted k₁ = -0.280000true -0.280000, off by 5e-15

Fitting a lens from straightness alone

No calibration target, no known scene, no camera. Only the knowledge that some edges in the picture were straight — and the coefficient comes back to fifteen digits. Then it comes back with a companion, and the two are correlated at −0.997.

1 rung · lens
horizon3 vanishing points at a finite distance2564 px · 8129 px · 531 px

One, two and three point are one construction

The names count how many vanishing points sit at a finite place in the picture, and the count is a fact about how the object is turned and the camera is aimed. Nothing about the method changes between them, and a vanishing point does not appear — it arrives from infinity.

1 rung · construction
00.50011.50205101520the dome's centre, off the entrance pupil (mm)worst departure from the pinhole it would be in air (degrees)centred: exactly zero6 mm → 0.635°a 100 mm dome in acrylic, n = 1.4910.106° per mm of centring error

The port that is not there

A flat window into water costs a lens a third of its field. A sphere centred on the entrance pupil costs nothing at all — not nearly nothing, exactly nothing — and six millimetres off centre costs 0.635°.

1 rung · refraction
the far field — where the stitch was fitted2.2 m — 3.2 px out24 m — 0.3 px outthe sky registers to 1e-13 pxthe foreground does not — up to 3.2 px

The eye is a place, not a point

Rotate a camera about the wrong point and the sky still stitches perfectly while the foreground slides. The misregistration falls as one over the distance, exactly — which is what says the fault is the pivot and not the lens.

1 rung · lens
recovered principal pointused to drawrecoveredgapfocal length853.90853.904e-15principal x345.0345.02e-12angle44.0°44.0°correct from 20 cm, at 160 mm wide44° across

Recovering the camera from the picture it drew

Draw a box from a known camera, forget the camera, and get it back from the twelve drawn edges alone. Agreement to one part in 10¹⁵ is a statement about the geometry, because the only thing that crossed between the two halves was a list of line segments.

1 rung · foundations
water, n = 1.333eyetruly 1.50 m downappears 0.818 m downh/n would be 1.125 mno single viewpoint — the rays miss by 17.1° of bend at the surfaceapparent depth 54.5% of the true one, not 75.0%

What a ray does at a surface

A pool looks three-quarters as deep as it is — but only if you look straight down. At sixty degrees the same bottom appears at half its depth, and at eighty at a fifth, which is why the far end of a pool looks shallow enough to walk in.

1 rung · refraction
a room 2.8 m across, eye 1.6 m up1 mthe same plan, 137× bigger137 midenticalpicturesthe picture — both scenes, drawn twice, one on top of the otherlargest disagreement 1e-13 px over 8 verticesone length has to come from outside the picture

The one thing a single view cannot give

Make the world a hundred and thirty-seven times larger and move the eye a hundred and thirty-seven times further away, and the picture does not change by a measurable amount. Every ratio in a scene is recoverable from one photograph and no size is, and that is not a caveat about the method — it is the shape of the method.

1 rung · metrology
correct from 26 cm, at 160 mm wide34° across

A shadow is a second projection

The construction that puts a shadow on the ground is the construction that puts the scene on the picture plane, with the lamp where the eye was. Shadow drawing is taught as a separate set of recipes and it is one operation with the centre moved, which is why the same code draws both.

1 rung · light
horizonshadows meet at x = -58, off the frameon the horizon, as it must be

Where shadows vanish

The shadows of parallel posts under the sun meet at a point, and that point must lie on the horizon. Under a lamp they meet at the lamp's foot instead. Both are checkable in any photograph, and a picture whose shadows fail the check was not lit by anything.

1 rung · light
level — the top is cut off0.00° of spreadtilted 13°4.55° of spreadshifted 95 px0.00° of spreada shift moves every point by exactly the shift95.0 px, and no direction at all

The principal point is not the centre

Every textbook that computes a focal length from two vanishing points supplies the middle of the frame as the principal point. On a shifted or cropped picture that is wrong, and it costs one and a half per cent of the answer at a fifth of a frame's shift.

1 rung · lens
no single viewpoint — the rays miss by 4.5 px, depth-dependentf recovered from it: 396.88 px

What survives a pane of glass

A slab of glass moves every point of a picture and moves no direction at all. So the camera recovered from a photograph taken through a display case is exactly the camera that took it — out of a picture in which nothing is where it was.

1 rung · refraction
15°30°45°60°85°the rim: 48.61° from straight upbeyond it: the bottom, reflected45° of sky0.469460° of sky0.370275° of sky0.211485° of sky0.0738area scalen = 1.333, so the rim is at asin(1/n) = 48.61°area scale 0.563 at the centre, 0.0738 at 85°

The sky inside a cone

From under water the whole sky — every direction out to the horizon — arrives inside a cone of 48.61°. Outside it the surface is a mirror. That cone is a picture surface, and it has a distortion no surface in the curved field has — an area scale that runs to zero.

1 rung · refraction
horizon — the image of the line at infinityvanishing point at x = 1464 — off the framecorrect from 26 cm, at 160 mm wide34° across

Where parallel lines meet

They meet at a point that is not in the plane, and the horizon is the line made of all such points. Treating that as bookkeeping misses what it buys — a vanishing point becomes an ordinary point of the picture, findable from the drawn lines, checkable, and enterable into any calculation the others are.

1 rung · foundations
54 px69 px84° across27% wider at the edge

Wide angle is not distortion

A wide lens stretches shapes at the edge of the frame by exactly 1/cos θ — 3% at 28° across, 41% at 90°. Every bit of that is what a correct rectilinear projection must do, and every bit of it disappears if the picture is viewed from the point it was made for. Nobody views it from there.

1 rung · viewing

All essays