Series

Anamorph — the series

8 essays on one idea, from the one that introduces it to the one that assumes the rest.
  1. eye, 74° offgrey: the word before the projectionblack: the same word, projected

    Anamorphosis is only a viewpoint

    A smear on a wall that resolves into a skull when the viewer stands in one particular place off to the side. It is not a trick added to perspective — it is perspective, with the centre of projection put somewhere nobody would naturally stand, and it is the clearest demonstration there is that every picture has such a point.

    part 3 · viewing
  2. the sheet, 150 × 105 mmthe eye, 52 mm up and 80 mm backgrey: the word standing upright · black: the same word on the paper142 mm from the sheet's middle

    An anamorph at true size, on paper

    An anamorph is the shadow of the intended picture, cast from the reader’s own eye. Every claim about a figure on a screen is quoted against an assumed display width, because nobody can know how wide a screen shows it; this one is not, because it ships a sheet in millimetres and states where to put an eye.

    part 4 · viewing
  3. the sheet, seen from abovemirrorthe eye, 2.4 radii upwhat stands up in the mirrorthe light path reverses to the eye to 1e-15scale varies 7.2× across the design

    The cylindrical mirror unbends it

    Put a mirrored cylinder in the middle of the sheet and the light path from the eye to the paper bends once. The map that results is not a homography and not a projection in the plane sense at all — it varies its scale by a factor of seven across the design, which is why the smear is unreadable and why the mirror can put it back.

    part 5 · viewing
  4. wallthe intended picturethe joineyecontinuous across the cornerand 3.88× the scale on one side

    The anamorph that crosses a corner

    Cast one design onto a floor and the wall at the end of it, from one eye. Each plane gets a collineation of its own; the two agree on the line where the planes meet, exactly, because a point of that line is a point of both. What they do not agree about is scale — the design runs 7.8 times its own size along the floor and 2.0 times up the wall, and the jump at the join is a factor of 3.9.

    part 6 · viewing
  5. the eye the picture is for1 faces no ray reaches9 steps, 18 planes, eye 1.65 m up17 used · 58.5% of the picture on risers

    A stair does not use all its faces

    A corner anamorph is two homologies and a flight of nine steps is eighteen, which is arithmetic and is the least of it. What a flight has that a corner does not is that which faces exist and which faces can be painted are different questions. From the top of a descending flight not one riser is reachable at any eye height, so half the planes are unpaintable by construction — and from the bottom of an ascending one, 58 per cent of the picture lands on risers that are 36 per cent of the surface.

    part 7 · viewing
  6. horizoncorrect from 21 cm, at 160 mm wide8/21 faces · 73% of the surface

    What an eye can paint

    A flight of steps has eighteen faces and no eye reaches more than fifteen. Pointed at a cluster of blocks, a seating rake and a corridor with a doorway in it, the same measurement finds 8 of 21, 7 of 13 and 6 of 7 — and the plane, which offers its whole self to every eye, is the control that makes the law a law rather than a fact about stairs.

    part 8 · viewing
  7. horizonfaces the eye, gets nothingfaces the eye, gets nothingcorrect from 21 cm, at 160 mm wide4 facing faces unreached · 3.24 m²

    Facing the reader is not being reachable

    A face turns toward the eye or it does not, and that is a dot product any reader can compute. Whether the eye’s rays actually land on it is a different question with a different answer — on a seating rake, three faces of ten that face the reader receive nothing, and they are 27 per cent of the facing area. On a corner the same test loses nothing at all, which is what makes the gap occlusion rather than arithmetic.

    part 9 · viewing
  8. where each reader's picture landsgoing up: risers67%going up: treads33%coming down: risersnothingcoming down: treads100%a flight of 9, eye at 1.65 m at each endthe two sets of faces do not overlap

    One flight, two pictures

    From the top of a descending flight every riser faces away, so the design lands entirely on treads. From the foot of the same flight the risers take 68 per cent of the design at a median stretch of 1.4, and the treads take the rest at a median of 2.6. Give each reader the faces the other cannot use and one staircase carries two pictures, with no face asked to hold both.

    part 10 · viewing

All series