Viewing position — where it appears
Named by 3 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The screen sets the distance
Every viewing distance this site has quoted was conditional on an assumed figure width. Replace the assumption with an actual chain — focal length, sensor width, display width — and the same 50 mm frame is correct from 9 cm on a phone, 83 cm on a monitor and 16.7 m in a cinema. Nobody is standing at any of them.
A wide field on a small screen
A picture rendered at a hundred degrees and shown on a screen that subtends forty-nine is being read from two and a half times its own station distance, so the depicted space is two and a half times too deep. The stretch at the edges everybody complains about is correct; the complaint is really that nobody is sitting where it would be invisible.
An anamorph at true size, on paper
An anamorph is the shadow of the intended picture, cast from the reader’s own eye. Every claim on this site is quoted against an assumed display width because the site cannot know how wide its figures really are; this one is not, because it ships a sheet in millimetres and states where to put an eye.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Viewing distanceDemonstrationDepth compressionfield of viewStation pointSubtended angleAnamorphosiscone of visionEdge stretchFocal lengthHomographyMarginal distortion