Visual Plane
every picture states the point it is correct from
Concept

single-view metrology — where it appears

6 essays name this object, across 3 fields. What follows is each of them, and the objects they name alongside it.
horizon — the eye's own heightbase — 0 mhorizon crossing — 1.62 mtop — 3.40 m recoveredthe vertical vanishing point is 8586 px above this framerecovered 3.400 m · true 3.400 m1.8 cm per pixel of click error

A height, out of one photograph

Four points on a vertical, one cross-ratio, and the height of something nobody measured. The only metric input is the photographer's own eye height, because the horizon is at eye level and that is the one piece of perspective folklore that is exactly true.

metrology · height the picturethe same plane, rectifieddoor — 0.5068 widths (true 0.5068)sill — 0.3026 widths (true 0.3026)diagonal — 1.1766 widths (true 1.1766)worst error 4e-16 relativethe probes were not used to build the map

Flattening a façade out of the photograph

Four corners of a rectangle whose proportions are known are enough to undo the projection of one plane. After that the plane can be measured with a ruler — lengths, angles, areas, all of it — in units of the rectangle's own width, and lengths the map was never given come back to fifteen digits.

metrology · rectify 00.50011.502-0.400-0.20000.200k₁departure of the cross-ratio from the world's value (%)pinhole1.29%the pinhole's own error, on the same four points2e-16 — the control

A lens destroys the invariant

The cross-ratio is the one thing a projection preserves, and everything checkable on this site is checked with it. A lens returns it one and a third per cent out where the pinhole is exact to fifteen digits — and the height error that follows tracks a quantity nobody would guess.

lens · distortion recovered principal pointused to drawrecoveredgapfocal length853.90853.904e-15principal x345.0345.02e-12angle44.0°44.0°—correct from 20 cm, at 160 mm wide44° across

Recovering the camera from the picture it drew

Draw a box from a known camera, forget the camera, and get it back from the twelve drawn edges alone. Agreement to one part in 10¹⁵ is a statement about the geometry, because the only thing that crossed between the two halves was a list of line segments.

foundations · recovery a room 2.8 m across, eye 1.6 m up1 mthe same plan, 137× bigger137 midenticalpicturesthe picture — both scenes, drawn twice, one on top of the otherlargest disagreement 1e-13 px over 8 verticesone length has to come from outside the picture

The one thing a single view cannot give

Make the world a hundred and thirty-seven times larger and move the eye a hundred and thirty-seven times further away, and the picture does not change by a measurable amount. Every ratio in a scene is recoverable from one photograph and no size is, and that is not a caveat about the method — it is the shape of the method.

metrology · scale 05101550100150200distance from the camera (metres)error in the recovered height, per pixel of click error (%)6 m — 0.55%25 m — 2.27%60 m — 5.43%120 m — 10.84%one pixel, on a 690 px picturelinear in distance

How wrong a measurement from one picture can be

The formula divides by a difference of two nearly equal numbers when the object is tall, which looked like the instability and is not. Measured, a taller object is recovered better and a more distant one worse — half a per cent per pixel at six metres and eleven per cent at a hundred and twenty. The argument that was wrong is as much the finding as the curve that replaced it.

metrology · height

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Vanishing pointCross ratioFocal lengthHorizonResidualerror propagationHomographyPicture planePrincipal pointProjective invariantSensitivityvertical vanishing point

All concepts