Concept

Focal recovery — where it appears

Reading a camera's focal length out of the picture it made, from vanishing points of directions known to be orthogonal. It needs the principal point, and assuming that to be the centre of a shifted or cropped frame costs a per cent or two of the answer.

Named by 10 essays across 4 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

horizondepicted height ÷ side0.3278corner angles90.000° — forced by the methoddepicted side ratio0.7195lens this drawing implies60° acrossdrawn exactly as the method prescribesthe free step is where the far edges go

The cube that is a box

The two-point cube every book teaches has a step it supplies no construction for. Place the two far edges symmetrically and the drawing depicts a square plan for free; place them eight points apart — a difference invisible on the page — and it depicts a box 1.4 times shallower than it is wide.

wrong · Cubebyeye
15° of yaw, 6° of pitch, 1.50 throw ratio81.3% of the panel reaches the corrected rectangleouter: the thrown quadrilateral · inner: what correction can keep18.7% of the panel discarded

A projector is a camera run backwards

Turn a projector fifteen degrees from square and it throws a trapezium; keystone correction cannot add light outside it, so it shrinks the picture until it fits and discards a sixth of the panel. And the instrument itself comes back out of the picture it threw — 2880 panel pixels recovered against 2880, by the function the wrong field wrote for hand-drawn cubes.

screen · Keystone
horizonprincipal pointv_zorthocentre: 812.7691 px · vᵀωu = 0: 812.7691 pxconjugacy residual 5.9e-10 in focal-length unitscorrect from 19 cm, at 160 mm wide46° across

One conic calibrates the camera

A focal length is usually recovered from two perpendicular vanishing points by an orthocentre construction with a square root in it. There is a second derivation with no construction and no square root — two vanishing points of perpendicular directions must be conjugate with respect to one conic in the picture — and the two agree to the last bit. They are not two methods. The conic is what a calibrated camera is.

foundations · Absoluteconic
vanishing point 1vanishing point 2where the camera wasassumed centre 50% alongfocal 1129.9 px · 0.283 : 1

The arc every eye stands on

Four drawn corners known to be a rectangle fix the horizon of their plane and nothing else. The eye that drew them has to see the two vanishing points at a right angle, so it lies on the circle those points are a diameter of — and every point of that arc reconstructs a genuine rectangle, with right angles to five parts in ten million million of a degree, and a different proportion.

construction · Rectangle
00.2500.5000.750120406080assumed centre of the picture, % of the way between the vanishing pointsreconstructed proportion of the rectanglethe rectangle that was there, 0.667 : 115.7× across the arcevery one a true rectangle

The proportion is the assumption

Read the proportions of a rectangle out of a photograph of it and the answer is a function of where the centre of the picture is assumed to be. Sweeping that assumption across the horizon takes one drawn quadrilateral from one part in fourteen to slightly wider than square, every reconstruction a genuine rectangle, and only a fiftieth of the sweep within five per cent of the truth.

construction · Rectangle
02.5e+35e+37.5e+31e+4200400600800one corner, slid along the picture (px)focal length the quadrilateral implies (px)admitted to 886 pxrefused past 903 px

The quadrilateral no rectangle casts

The relation that reads a camera out of a drawn rectangle has a minus sign in it, and the minus sign is a refusal: two vanishing points on the same side of the assumed centre give the square root of a positive number, and no camera makes that quadrilateral out of a rectangle. Watching the refusal arrive shows what it is worth — one corner has to travel most of the picture's width before it fires.

construction · Rectangle
the horizonthe centre, 318focal 622.396 pxtrue 622.396 px

Perpendicular is a pairing

On a horizon, the vanishing point of a direction and the vanishing point of the direction at right angles to it are joined by a map that is its own inverse. Such a map has two degrees of freedom rather than three, so two pairs determine it — and its two imaginary fixed points are the focal length and the centre of the picture, handed back from two rectangles on one floor with nothing assumed.

foundations · Involution
the photographv1v2v3orthocentre = principal pointcorrect from 4 cm, at 30 mm wideself-polar to 3.1e-13 px · orthocentre 1.4e-13 px

The triangle a camera cannot move

Three mutually perpendicular directions give three vanishing points, and that triangle is self-polar with respect to the image of the absolute conic — to 3.1e-13 px, with no length and no angle anywhere in the statement. Turn one direction two degrees out of square and the polars miss their sides by 65.8 px. The statistic this collection has been printing as evidence for the same claim, meanwhile, is an identity that cannot fail.

foundations · Poleandpolar
station pointmeasuring pointvanishing pointthe picturedrawn at 0.48× · side ratio 1.000 · height 1.000a cube, constructed

A square plan is not a cube

An even-handed two-point cube is square in plan wherever its far edges go, and a cube at exactly one placement — 19.4 per cent of the way to each vanishing point on the layout measured. At the taught drawing's 42 per cent it is a square slab a third as tall as it is wide. Measuring points supply that placement, and they do not make a hand exact; they move its slip to marks where it costs a tenth as much.

wrong · Cubebyeye
horizondots on the horizon: measuring points and vanishing points · station point 595 px below, not drawnturned 30°, the same lens and near edgea cube to 3e-13

A turned cube punishes the eye, not the construction

Turn a two-point cube until one face is nearly square to the picture and one vanishing point runs 6,500 px off the sheet. The measuring point it swings to does not run with it — it stays on the sheet — and the constructed marks go on forgiving slips ten to three hundred times what the eye is allowed. What collapses is the by-eye placement: the far edge of the face that becomes a sliver must be put within a third of a pixel.

wrong · Cubebyeye

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Vanishing pointDemonstrationDepicted rectangleFree parameterHorizonPrincipal pointCamera calibrationStation pointAbsolute conicdegrees of freedomMeasuring pointtwo-point construction

All concepts