Series

Planar — the series

6 essays on one idea, from the one that introduces it to the one that assumes the rest.
  1. left pictureright pictureevery one of them fits every mark1.6e-6 px

    A flat scene fixes no second eye

    Eight marks on one plane leave the eight-point design matrix two ranks short, so a two-parameter family of fundamental matrices satisfies every mark exactly — three of its members are 1.41 apart after normalisation and all three fit to 1.6 × 10⁻⁶ pixels. The same photographs determine the plane's own map from four marks, to 5.9 × 10⁻¹³ pixels.

    part 1 · twoviews
  2. 0306090-3-2-1out-of-plane spread, as a fraction of the scene's own extent (powers of ten)error in the recovered translation direction, in degreeswith 0.3 px of reading errorexact marksthe geometry is a step and the measurement is a slope9 reliefs

    How flat is flat enough

    With exact marks the transition has no width at all — 84° of pose error at exactly coplanar and 0.000° at eight parts in ten thousand of relief. Put three tenths of a pixel of reading error in and the same sweep becomes a slope three decades wide, crossing into usefulness when the out-of-plane parallax reaches about ten times the marking error.

    part 2 · twoviews
  3. the second pictureepipole22 parallax lines miss the epipole by at most 1.7e-10 pxsecond camera stepped forward

    Two marks off a known plane find the other eye

    Map a courtyard's ground from one picture into the other, and every raised mark lands somewhere the map did not send it — displaced along a line through the image of the other camera, to a fifth of a billionth of a pixel. Two such marks put that image where it is, and with it the whole epipolar geometry.

    part 3 · twoviews
  4. the second picture0.650.710.431.421.6122 raised marks, disc size: the coefficient on the epipolek ∝ h/Z to 4e-14

    A parallax length is a height over a depth

    After a known plane's map, every raised mark's displacement points at the other camera's image, and its length carries the mark's height above the plane over its depth — but not as the ratio of lengths it looks like. That ratio departs from the point's own number by up to 45 per cent. Read as a coefficient on the epipole, the same length gives height over depth from the first camera to four parts in a hundred trillion, the same from every second picture.

    part 4 · twoviews
  5. second eye1% error5% error20% errordisc area ∝ error10 m past30 m pastprobes 1 m up · marks read to 1 px · 60 trialscameras side by side

    A plane's coefficient reaches as far as its parallax

    After a known plane's map, every raised point's displacement is its height over its depth, read as a coefficient on the epipole — exactly, for any point either picture sees. The worry was that the number would be local, good only near the floor whose marks fixed the map. Read to a pixel, it is not a distance on the floor that runs out. It is a length in the picture: the point's error is about 260 per cent over its parallax in pixels, wherever the point stands.

    part 5 · twoviews
  6. 00.50000.50011.502second pictures (log₁₀)error in the coefficient, % (log₁₀)one directionround the pointbaselines of 2.4 mfloor 2.96%

    Second pictures reach a floor unless they go round

    A point with little parallax can be read against several second pictures, and each should count in proportion to the square of its parallax. Doing that does less than expected, because every second picture shares the same first reading. In one direction, no number of them goes below one pixel over the longest parallax. Spread them round the point and a fit can find out where the first reading really was, and the floor goes away.

    part 6 · twoviews

All series