Cubebyeye — the series
-
The cube that is a box
The two-point cube every book teaches has a step it supplies no construction for. Place the two far edges symmetrically and the drawing depicts a square plan for free; place them eight points apart — a difference invisible on the page — and it depicts a box 1.4 times shallower than it is wide.
-
A square plan is not a cube
An even-handed two-point cube is square in plan wherever its far edges go, and a cube at exactly one placement — 19.4 per cent of the way to each vanishing point on the layout measured. At the taught drawing's 42 per cent it is a square slab a third as tall as it is wide. Measuring points supply that placement, and they do not make a hand exact; they move its slip to marks where it costs a tenth as much.
-
A turned cube punishes the eye, not the construction
Turn a two-point cube until one face is nearly square to the picture and one vanishing point runs 6,500 px off the sheet. The measuring point it swings to does not run with it — it stays on the sheet — and the constructed marks go on forgiving slips ten to three hundred times what the eye is allowed. What collapses is the by-eye placement: the far edge of the face that becomes a sliver must be put within a third of a pixel.
-
A slight tilt costs a construction more than a steep one
Give the measuring-point construction a third vanishing point and price every mark again. The third point itself costs almost nothing, even near the sheet. The eye's own tolerance barely moves. But at a tilt of a few degrees the two horizontal vanishing points become as tight as the eye, because the centre of vision is being found from a point seven thousand pixels off the page. Tell the construction where the centre is and that cost vanishes.