Visual hull — where it appears
Named by 7 essays across 4 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Three views do not fix the solid
A stepped block on a six-cell grid draws a front, a top and a side view. So does a solid with a third of its material, and so does one with more than the block has — 192 cells against 64, every filled square in all three views identical. The drawing office's triple bounds a part between two solids and does not determine it, and the gap runs to a factor of n.
The dish no outline reaches
An outline is a pair of numbers per direction and nothing more, so a shape built from outlines has two errors that behave differently. The part outside the convex hull falls as one over the square of the view count. The part inside a concavity is the same area at four views and at a hundred and twenty-eight, because no pair of supporting lines ever reaches into a bite.
An outline reaches a waist and not a dish
In a cross-section nothing a silhouette does can enter a concavity. On a solid that stops being true, because a solid has lines a section does not contain. A spool's waist comes back in full from a ring of outlines, and a dish in the same object's lid never does. What decides it is whether a straight line can leave, and the answer is water.
A groove is reached only along its own plane
A groove round a drum is the kind of hollow outlines can clear, and a level ring clears it completely. Raise the camera three degrees and more than half of it stays filled at any number of views. On this object the height of the camera decides the result, and the count of views buys almost nothing.
Facing the reader is not being reachable
A face turns toward the eye or it does not, and that is a dot product any reader can compute. Whether the eye’s rays actually land on it is a different question with a different answer — on a seating rake, three faces of ten that face the reader receive nothing, and they are 27 per cent of the facing area. On a corner the same test loses nothing at all, which is what makes the gap occlusion rather than arithmetic.
Counting shadows is not counting lamps
Two lamps close together cast one connected dark patch and the drawn lines say two. One lamp behind two cards casts two patches and the lines say one, exactly. And the arrangement where the patch count is right — two lamps far apart — has no fully dark region at all, so the same floor answers one, two or zero depending on which darkness is being counted.
How many shadows determine the object
One lamp's shadow says only that a convex section lies inside a wedge 10.5 times its own area; four already cut that down to 1.17 times, and 128 close a convex section's boundary to 0.10 mm everywhere. The identical sweep on a section with a bite taken out of it stalls at 70.3 mm, 675 times worse, because an outline is the boundary of the smallest convex body with that shadow and no direction ever sees inside a concavity.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
SilhouetteConvex hullContour generatorConvergence orderinstrument limitOrthographicReconstructionDemonstrationIdentifiabilitynecessary, not sufficientOcclusionreconstruction ambiguity