Solid angle — where it appears
Named by 9 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
A mirror ball is an equal-area fisheye
Photograph a mirror ball from far enough away and its rule is ρ = R·sin(θ/2), which is the equal-area fisheye — not an approximation to it, the rule. Measured, the departure falls from 4.27% of the picture's radius at 3 radii to 0.01% at 2000, while the next-best named rule stays 21% out at every distance. And the ball reflects 100.0% of the directions there are, which no designed surface does.
The third column is area
This field has measured what each picture surface does to straight lines and to shape. Both are questions for somebody looking at the picture. Somebody counting in it wants a third column, and the same projections have been returning it all along without anybody asking: the equal-area fisheye holds a square degree at one printed area to 8e-8 across 80° off axis, while a flat plane inflates it 191-fold.
Counting cloud by counting pixels
A sky camera looks up and something counts the white pixels. On an equal-area fisheye that answer is right to 0.01%, which is the grid's own error. On an equidistant one it is 9% low, on stereographic 27% low, and on an ordinary flat lens 77% low — against a cover that is known exactly, because the clouds here are caps whose solid angles add. Weighting each pixel by the surface's area scale repairs every one of them to better than a fifth of a per cent.
The edge of a shadow is drawn on the object
The outline of a cast shadow is the image of a curve, and the curve is on the caster. It is not painted there: it slides when the lamp moves, it is not the outline the camera sees, and the two coincide only in the arrangement where no shadow is visible at all.
Where a surface spends its pixels
A picture surface is a budget before it is anything else, and the six named ones distribute the same marks over the same directions quite differently. The flat plane lays 25.0 times as many on a square degree at the edge of a 70° field as on one at the centre; the equal-area fisheye is flat to 8.3e-6 per cent.
A pole is a line
An equirectangular surface sends one direction to a whole edge, so an 8° cap of sky at the pole takes 4.50 per cent of the marks against a 0.49 per cent share of the world. The worst singularity is not the pole at all — the equidistant fisheye's antipode costs ×17.9 — and only the cube map, which never holds a sphere in one chart, is bounded.
Shot on one surface, shown on another
Two picture surfaces are two charts of the same pencil of rays, so a reprojection between them is a change of coordinates and loses no geometry at all — bit-exact at all 408 sampled directions. What it costs lies elsewhere — 70 per cent of the source has nowhere to go, and the target wants ×5.49 the marks at its edge.
The hole a rig cannot fill
A two-lens spherical rig covers every direction between its two lenses and still cannot see 0.470 per cent of the sphere directly beneath it, reaching 12.8 degrees from straight down — its own tripod, standing exactly where neither lens can look. No arrangement of lenses removes it, because it is not a gap in coverage; it is the rig occluding itself.
What a point in shadow can see of the sky
A place directly under a slab is not sealed off from the sky at all — it sees 83.4 per cent of it, 5.242 of the 6.283 steradians a place in the open has, against 5.240 from the closed form for a rectangle's own solid angle. The same counted-directions call that measures a lamp's penumbra measures this fraction too, and the two agree to 2.50e-4 with the source simply swapped from a lamp to the whole sky.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Area scaleEquidistantFisheyeStereographicEquisolidfield of viewPicture surfaceAngular resolutionAnisotropyConformalEqual-areaEquirectangular