Concept

Equidistant — where it appears

The fisheye rule with picture radius proportional to the angle off axis, which reads angles off the paper with a ruler and preserves neither area nor shape. Its radius is linear in the angle, so a protractor laid on the picture reads directions directly, which is what it is chosen for.

Named by 7 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

00.2500.5000.7501050100150angle of the direction from the camera's own axis (degrees)where it lands in the picture, as a fraction of the picture's radiusequisolidequidistantorthographica ball 24 cm across, camera 24 radii offequal-area within 0.82% · equidistant 21.5%

A mirror ball is an equal-area fisheye

Photograph a mirror ball from far enough away and its rule is ρ = R·sin(θ/2), which is the equal-area fisheye — not an approximation to it, the rule. Measured, the departure falls from 4.27% of the picture's radius at 3 radii to 0.01% at 2000, while the next-best named rule stays 21% out at every distance. And the ball reflects 100.0% of the directions there are, which no designed surface does.

mirrors · Mirrorball
012020406080angle off the axis (degrees)area printed per solid angle, against its value on axis (log₁₀)equal-areaequidistantcylinderstereographicplaneswept at 45° to the axes, out to 80°equal-area 1.000 · flat plane 191×

The third column is area

This field has measured what each picture surface does to straight lines and to shape. Both are questions for somebody looking at the picture. Somebody counting in it wants a third column, and the same projections have been returning it all along without anybody asking: the equal-area fisheye holds a square degree at one printed area to 8e-8 across 80° off axis, while a flat plane inflates it 191-fold.

curved · Equalarea
share of the 70° field counted as cloud — the truth is 10.31%equal-area fisheye10.31% (-0.0%)equidistant fisheye9.37% (-9.1%)stereographic7.56% (-26.6%)flat plane2.40% (-76.8%)401² of picture, four caps of cloud0.01% on the equal-area rule, -77% on the flat plane

Counting cloud by counting pixels

A sky camera looks up and something counts the white pixels. On an equal-area fisheye that answer is right to 0.01%, which is the grid's own error. On an equidistant one it is 9% low, on stereographic 27% low, and on an ordinary flat lens 77% low — against a cover that is known exactly, because the clouds here are caps whose solid angles add. Weighting each pixel by the surface's area scale repairs every one of them to better than a fifth of a per cent.

curved · Equalarea
plane — ×24.99 edge to centrecylinder — ×2.40 edge to centrestereographic — ×2.22 edge to centreequidistant — ×1.30 edge to centreequal-area — ×1.00 edge to centreequirect. — ×1.34 edge to centre36 cells of 377 square degrees, out to 70°equal-area ×1.00 · plane ×25.0

Where a surface spends its pixels

A picture surface is a budget before it is anything else, and the six named ones distribute the same marks over the same directions quite differently. The flat plane lays 25.0 times as many on a square degree at the edge of a 70° field as on one at the centre; the equal-area fisheye is flat to 8.3e-6 per cent.

curved · Resolution
plane — line, 5e-18cylinder — sinusoid, 6e-17stereographic — circle, 6e-16equidistant — circle, 9e-4equal-area — circle, 2e-3equirect. — sinusoid, 1e-4tilted 10°, sampled over 140° of azimuththe horizon swings ±10°

The horizon's shape belongs to the surface

The horizon is one great circle of directions whatever draws it, and at zero tilt all six named surfaces draw it straight. Tilt the camera and they separate — and the cylinder, not the equirectangular surface, is the one whose horizon is exactly a cosine, to 9e-16 against 8.3e-3.

curved · Horizonshape
one direction — the pole — drawn as the whole of this edge8° cap at the pole: ×9.2the same cap, 20° off axis: ×0.646both caps hold 201 square degrees of sky×14 between them

A pole is a line

An equirectangular surface sends one direction to a whole edge, so an 8° cap of sky at the pole takes 4.50 per cent of the marks against a 0.49 per cent share of the world. The worst singularity is not the pole at all — the equidistant fisheye's antipode costs ×17.9 — and only the cube map, which never holds a sphere in one chart, is bounded.

curved · Singularity
02401020304050degrees off the optical axis, inside the reprojected framemarks the target wants, per mark the source laid downone mark for one mark×5.49 at the edge68% of the source unusedcorrect from 6.7 cm at 160 mm wide

Shot on one surface, shown on another

Two picture surfaces are two charts of the same pencil of rays, so a reprojection between them is a change of coordinates and loses no geometry at all — bit-exact at all 408 sampled directions. What it costs lies elsewhere — 70 per cent of the source has nowhere to go, and the target wants ×5.49 the marks at its edge.

curved · Composite

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

FisheyeArea scaleSolid angleStereographicfield of viewPicture surfaceEquirectangularEquisolidAngular resolutionAnisotropyConformalEqual-area

All concepts