Angular size — where it appears
Named by 2 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Also named here as calibration — the same set of essays touches all of them, so they are one junction rather than several.
One picture of a ball
The outline of a ball in a photograph fixes the cone of rays that graze it, so the cone's axis is the direction of the ball's centre and its half-angle is the arcsine of radius over distance — both exactly, and neither of them separately. A ball a hundred and thirty-seven times larger, a hundred and thirty-seven times further away, draws the identical conic. And the drawn ellipse's own centre is not the image of the ball's.
Two pictures of a ball
Two outlines give two tangent cones, and where their axes cross is the ball's centre — with the radius following from either half-angle. There is no correspondence problem, because a ball's outline in one picture and its outline in another are guaranteed to be the same ball; and there is a degeneracy, which is the two eyes and the ball in a line, and the solver refuses it rather than returning something plausible.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
CalibrationDemonstrationQuadricReconstructionscale ambiguityTangent coneBaselinecentre of projectionConditioningConicDepth from disparityEpipolar geometry