Concept

Isometric — where it appears

The axonometric projection whose three axis scales are equal, at a foreshortening of 0.8165 on every one of them. The equal scales are forced rather than chosen — √(2/3) follows from the identity the three foreshortenings satisfy — and the word promises an equality it does not deliver against true size.

Named by 10 essays across 4 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

elevationx 1.000y 1.000z 0.000cavalierx 1.000y 1.000z 1.000cabinetx 1.000y 1.000z 0.500isometricx 0.816y 0.816z 0.816dimetricx 0.943y 0.943z 0.471axis scales measured from the drawingall 5 preserve midpoints

Parallel projection is not primitive perspective

Isometric and oblique drawing are not what people used before they worked perspective out. They are a different answer to a different question, and the difference is one measurable quantity — a parallel projection preserves the ratio in which a point divides a segment, and a perspective projection destroys it by 7% of the segment's drawn length at a comfortable depth, rising to 13% over the range the slider covers.

parallel · Parallel
elevation0.0000two equal, orthographiccabinet0.5000two equal, obliquecavalier1.0000all three equal, obliquedimetric0.4714all three different, orthographicisometric0.8165all three equal, orthographic ←trimetric0.5479all three different, orthographicsmallest of the three axis scalesmeasured from each projection

What isometric actually means

The three axis scales are equal to each other. They are not equal to one. Every unit along every axis is drawn at 0.8165 of its true length, which is √(2/3), and a great deal of confusion about isometric drawing comes from the word promising something it does not deliver.

parallel · Isometric
halfway along the drawn linethe actual midpointcorrect from 26 cm, at 160 mm wide7 px apart

The eye taken to infinity

A parallel projection is a photograph from infinitely far away with the lens lengthened to match. That is not an analogy — it is the limit, it can be watched happening, and it explains why a long lens flattens a scene and why an isometric drawing has no viewing distance to state.

parallel · Limit
2 — every orthographic projectionisometric · axonometric 0.816 · 0.816 · 0.8162.0000dimetric · axonometric 0.943 · 0.943 · 0.4712.0000trimetric · axonometric 0.876 · 0.966 · 0.5482.0000cavalier · oblique 1.000 · 1.000 · 1.0003.0000cabinet · oblique 1.000 · 1.000 · 0.5002.2500elevation · orthographic 1.000 · 1.000 · 0.0002.0000military · planometric 1.000 · 1.000 · 1.0003.0000isometric's three equal scales are forced to √(2/3) = 0.816497not chosen — the identity leaves no other value

Which axis scales are possible

An orthographic projection's three foreshortening ratios always satisfy one identity — their squares sum to two. Isometric's famous 0.8165 is forced by it rather than chosen, and cavalier's 1, 1, 1 sums to three, which is the arithmetic saying cavalier is not the ORTHOGRAPHIC projection of anything. A later rung shows what the departure is a measurement of.

parallel · Axonometric
head0.668profile — the outline that names a faceeye0.669frontal — an eye in profile is a wedgeshoulders0.669frontal — the width that says two armslegs0.668profile — a stride is a side viewpond0.326plan — a rectangle of water is a rectangle1.000 — what its own aspect keepsshare of each part that reaches the picture, from the best single direction|d · n| for each part3.000 of 5, swept and in closed form

Assembled from several views

An Egyptian relief takes each part of a figure from the direction that identifies it — head in profile, eye and shoulders frontal, a pond in plan. What that buys is exactly measurable: any single viewing direction keeps at most √k of k perpendicular aspects, so the best compromise view retains 58% of each.

conventions · Aspective
isometric0.57741 : 1.732dimetric0.88191 : 1.134cavalier1.0000a circlemilitary0.57741 : 1.732the xy plane's drawn ellipseratio of the ellipse's axes, sampled

A ruler on an isometric drawing

Isometric drawing has one scale — 0.8165 — and every account of it stops there. But that number is about three directions and a drawing has infinitely many, so a length measured off the paper and divided by 0.8165 comes back anywhere between √(1/2) and √(3/2) of the truth: 29.3% short to 22.5% long, with nothing in the picture to say which.

parallel · Ruler
true ellipse — axis ratio 0.5774four arcs — 5.72% short along the major axisthe four tangent points are exactworst departure 5.72% of the semi-major axis

The ellipse the drawing office draws

Every isometric ellipse template is cut to a construction of four circular arcs, and every account of it calls the result an ellipse. It is not one and cannot be: a circular arc has constant curvature and a conic's varies, so the two can agree at four points and nowhere between. The four-centre curve reaches 2√2/3 of the true semi-major axis — 5.72% short — and its minor axis is 3.53% too long.

parallel · Isocircle
leftfrontrightbackupdownacross the left/front seam: 1.80°, with each side straight to 7e-16corner area ×5.196anisotropy √3 = 1.7321 there

Six flat pictures of everything

There is one way to photograph the whole sphere and keep every straight line straight, and it is to stop using one surface. Six flat pictures at ninety degrees cover everything, each of them a perfect pinhole, and the price is paid entirely at the seams — where a straight line does not bend but kinks, by an angle that reaches 45 degrees and is exactly zero for the lines lying in the seam's own plane.

curved · Cubemap
six tangents across 3 of the four arcs1.69% of the width

Six tangents and the point nobody drew

Brianchon's theorem is a test a reader can run on a finished drawing with nothing but a straightedge — six tangents, three diagonals, and a question about whether they meet. Pointed at the drawing office's four-centre ellipse it rejects the curve by 1.7 per cent of the figure's own width, 546 times the instrument's own floor, with no true ellipse to compare against.

wrong · Conic
isometricdimetrictrimetricelevationx scalez scalea curve, not a squarethe third scale is not free

The dimetric the set square draws

An orthographic direction has two parameters and produces three axis scales, so the achievable triples are a surface rather than a list. The drawing office's dimetric — one axis at 1 in 8, the other at 7 in 8 — has the right three scales exactly and the wrong two angles, and the picture it makes is an oblique projection of a cube rather than an orthographic one.

parallel · Axonometric

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

OrthographicForeshorteningDrawing systemAxonometricAnisotropyDemonstrationDimetricFour-centre ellipseOblique projectionPicture planeTrimetricArea scale

All concepts