Depth reversal — where it appears
Named by 2 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Any three lines you draw are a cube
This site has said, for four rungs, that cavalier projection is not the projection of anything — because its axis scales sum to three where every orthographic projection sums to two. That is true of orthographic projection and false of projection. Three lines from a point, drawn by hand, are a picture of an actual cube seen from an actual direction, and the cube and the direction come out of the drawing in closed form.
The drawing does not say which corner is nearer
The Necker cube is filed under optical illusion, as though the flipping were something the eye does. It is not: a parallel drawing of a cube is a drawing of exactly two cubes, mirror images of each other, and they project to the identical picture to the last bit. Perspective rules the second one out at a rate exactly inverse in the eye's distance, and never entirely.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
DemonstrationDrawing systemParallel projectionPohlkeAxonometricDegeneracyDepth cueOblique projectionOrthographicOrthographic limitPlanometricProjected not constructed