Concept

Collineation — where it appears

A map taking lines to lines, which is what a projection between two planes is and what a projection onto a curved surface is not. That is the exact boundary between the flat picture surfaces and the curved ones, and it is why a curved receiving surface admits no homography at all.

Named by 10 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

horizonABCDon the groundin the picturelength AB1.00011.3930ratio AB:CD0.56670.6837cross-ratio1.31681.3168correct from 26 cm, at 160 mm wide34° across

What a projection destroys

A projection loses length, angle, area and the ratio in which a point divides a segment. Exactly one quantity comes through untouched, and almost everything that can be checked about a picture is checked with it — including, as it turns out, some things it cannot check at all.

foundations · Crossratio
floorpicture planeeye level — no mark above thiseye · 1.62 m up, 2.40 m backthe ground line, seen from abovethe mark runs to 3.00 ma point 1.62 m up casts no mark at all

A floor anamorph is three numbers

An anamorph is described everywhere as a picture stretched until only one viewpoint can read it, which says what it looks like and nothing about what it is. Cast one onto a floor and fit a map to the marks, and the map turns out to be a planar homology — a line of fixed points, one point off it, and a single ratio. Those three numbers are not a description of the eye. They are the eye.

viewing · Anamorphmap
ground line — right from anywherefaint: intended · solid: seendeparture (mm) against height (m)01.38the error map is an elation, with the ground line as its axisno characteristic ratio — nothing off the axis is fixed250 mm sidewayszero on the axis, 212.5 mm at the top

Where the anamorph still works

A picture correct from one point raises an obvious question that nobody answers with a number — how far may the eye move. The answer here is exact rather than approximate: a wrong viewpoint composes the intended picture with a central collineation whose axis is the line the picture stands on, so the error is zero along that line and grows linearly upward, and a step sideways costs precisely as much as the same step upward.

viewing · Anamorphreach
barrel vaulteye · 1.62 mon the floor1e-12 mmon the vault529.4 mmworst miss of the best homography, log scalevault radius 4.0 m7.7% of the extent, against 4e-14%

The ceiling that is not a plane

Paint the same design for the same eye onto a floor and onto a barrel vault, then fit the best possible homography to each set of marks. On the floor it misses by femtometres, because the map is a collineation and four marks determine every other. On the vault it misses by half a metre, and no choice of four marks helps — which is where every projective construction made for a floor stops applying.

viewing · Vaultanamorph
centrefaint dots: before · solid: afterhomologyratio 2.4000

What a flat map leaves alone

A projectivity of the plane is eight numbers in a matrix, and reading them tells a reader nothing. What it does is decided by its fixed points, and there are exactly three cases: three isolated fixed points, or a whole line of them with one point off it, or a whole line of them with the point fallen onto it. The middle case has five numbers instead of eight and every point slides along a line, and it is what most of the maps this site builds turn out to be.

foundations · Fixedstructure
constructionfixed structurea shadow, ground to floorhomology · ratio 0.6719a floor anamorphhomology · ratio -1.4815a mirror in a vertical planehomology · ratio -1.0000a rectificationgeneral · three fixed points3 of 4 are centrala line of fixed points is what they share

Three constructions, one map

A shadow cast on a floor, an anamorph painted on one, and a reflection in a mirror are usually treated as three different subjects, each with its own derivation and its own figure. Decomposed into their fixed points and lines, three of them are the same kind of map — a central collineation with a line of fixed points — and the fourth, a rectification, is not. That difference separates changing where a picture is seen from, from changing one picture into another.

foundations · Centralmaps
wallthe intended picturethe joineyecontinuous across the cornerand 3.88× the scale on one side

The anamorph that crosses a corner

Cast one design onto a floor and the wall at the end of it, from one eye. Each plane gets a collineation of its own; the two agree on the line where the planes meet, exactly, because a point of that line is a point of both. What they do not agree about is scale — the design runs 7.8 times its own size along the floor and 2.0 times up the wall, and the jump at the join is a factor of 3.9.

viewing · Anamorph
020406011.5022.503candidate height for the eye, in metreswhat the best rectangle leaves over, in millimetresa flat floor: every height fitsthe eye that made the markscurvature costs the collineationand buys the parameter back

The height a flat floor cannot give

The marks of a floor anamorph name the eye's position on the floor exactly and say nothing about how high it was — every candidate height explains them perfectly, to one part in a thousand trillion. That is a fact about planes rather than about anamorphs. Ripple the floor by six centimetres and the family collapses: the true height explains the marks exactly and the nearest wrong one, five centimetres away, leaves two millimetres on a design 1.8 metres wide.

viewing · Anamorphrecovery
S₁S₂abclean 24° · centre at 0.45 along the joinprobe closes to 1.2e-13 px

Every projectivity is two perspectivities

A perspectivity is what one eye does between two lines, and two of them compose to any projectivity at all. The construction closes on a point nobody used to 1.4e-14 pixels, both of its free choices move the second centre 663 pixels across the picture, and the composite does not move at all.

foundations · Perspectivity
the centrethe axiscorrect from 22 cm, at 160 mm widedihedral 16° · meets 1.0e-14 m off the line

The theorem that is obvious one dimension up

Desargues in the plane needs a proof and in space needs none — two triangles in different planes have their corresponding sides meeting on the line where the planes cross, and the meets land 1.0e-14 metres off it. The plane figure is a shadow of the spatial one, and five different solids cast the same photograph to 2.0e-12 pixels.

foundations · Desargues

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

AnamorphosisHomographyDemonstrationPlanar homologyProjective mapCentral collineationCharacteristic ratioFixed pointCross-ratioElationStation pointVanishing point

All concepts