Theme

The thread: The viewer is in the geometry — page 2

A perspective picture is a projection from a point, and that point is a fact about the picture — computable from its focal length and the width it is shown at. Every figure states the distance it is correct from, because leaving it out is what makes the subject feel like a matter of taste. Essays 25 to 48 of 79.
the piazza, in planthe Baptistery, 25.6 m53 m27.2°the cathedral doorthe panel, and the eye it needsthe Baptistery fills 100%the eye is 60 cm back — off this sheet290 mm panel · 27.2° of Baptisterycorrect from 60 cm · 27° across Constructing a view

Brunelleschi drilled a hole in his panel

The first perspective demonstration in the European record came with its viewing point enforced — a hole through the back of the panel, a mirror held out in front, and one place to stand. That distance is computable from the panel's size and the angle the Baptistery subtends, and the answer lands squarely on the arrangement the account describes.

the sheet, seen from abovemirrorthe eye, 2.4 radii upwhat stands up in the mirrorthe light path reverses to the eye to 1e-15scale varies 7.2× across the design Where to stand

The cylindrical mirror unbends it

Put a mirrored cylinder in the middle of the sheet and the light path from the eye to the paper bends once. The map that results is not a homography and not a projection in the plane sense at all — it varies its scale by a factor of seven across the design, which is why the smear is unreadable and why the mirror can put it back.

vertical difference up to 30.8 px, drawn 8× overbaseline 63 mmconvergence 2.0 m The second projection

Turning the cameras inwards

A stereo pair made by rotating two cameras toward a common point puts the same world point at different heights in the two pictures — up to thirty pixels here, on a frame of four hundred. Two eyes level with each other see every point at the same height, so a pair with vertical difference is a pair of pictures of no scene at all.

in units of the 1.20 m fixation distance0.0000 cm over 121 azimuths What a pair is for

The depth a pair calls zero

Two eyes verged on a point agree — the same coordinate in both pictures — not on a plane at the fixation distance but on a circle through both eyes and that point. Found by bisection along 121 azimuths and fitted rather than assumed, it is a circle to 0.0000 cm; at 26° off centre it lies 23 cm nearer than a flat wall does.

the picture — identical at every viewing distanceplan: the true cube, and the solid depicteddepth × 2.12, width × 1.00correct from 18.8 cm at 160 mm wideread from 40 cm — depth × 2.12 Where to stand

Standing in the wrong place

A picture read from twice the distance it is correct from depicts a scene twice as deep — and not one mark on the paper moves. The error is invisible in the picture, which is why it survives everywhere.

correct from 20 cm, at 160 mm wideverticals converge 3.59° · horizon 213 px off centre Constructing a view

The plane is a choice

A projection has a centre and a surface, and they move independently. Keep the eye and turn the picture plane and every point of any scene lands where one 3×3 matrix says, to 2.5e-13 px. Move the eye instead and the matrix fitted to four points is exact at those four and out by 32.0 px everywhere else. The first is a homography of the picture; the second is parallax, and nothing about the picture can undo it.

the seatcentre of curvatureR = 1000 mm · seat at 650 mm51.4 px off a homography The second projection

The screen is a picture surface too

A curved television is one of the six named picture surfaces sitting in a living room, and from its own axis it delivers azimuth in proportion to the picture, exactly. What it is shown is a rectilinear picture from a sofa, and the difference is not a matter of degree — a flat screen from any seat shows a homography of the intended picture, so it is a correct picture of a transformed scene, and a curved one shows a map that is not a homography from any seat at all.

00.50011.50-0.25000.2500.5000.750the blur a reader is prepared to call sharp, in pixels (powers of ten)near and far limits of the band, in metres (powers of ten)the focus distance2 pxone lens, one focus setting, five criteria5 bands The rectangle behind the lens

The sharp band is a decision

One 50 mm lens at f/2.8 focused at three metres has a sharp band half a metre deep or an unbounded one, and nothing about the optics changes between them — only how large a blur disc a reader is prepared to ignore. Every quantity usually quoted about depth of field is that acceptance restated, including the rule that a third of the band lies in front, which is true at one distance and nowhere else.

floorpicture planeeye level — no mark above thiseye · 1.62 m up, 2.40 m backthe ground line, seen from abovethe mark runs to 3.00 ma point 1.62 m up casts no mark at all Where to stand

A floor anamorph is three numbers

An anamorph is described everywhere as a picture stretched until only one viewpoint can read it, which says what it looks like and nothing about what it is. Cast one onto a floor and fit a map to the marks, and the map turns out to be a planar homology — a line of fixed points, one point off it, and a single ratio. Those three numbers are not a description of the eye. They are the eye.

corrected from the picture — 0e+0° between the verticalscorrect from 20 cm, at 160 mm wideagrees with a level camera at the same eye to 3e-13 px Constructing a view

Straightening does not move the eye

Correct a photograph's converging verticals and what comes out agrees with a level camera at the same point — one the correction was never shown — to 3e-13 px, with the verticals parallel to 0e+0°. The cross-ratio of four points along a ground line reads 1.3333 before and after, so the corrected picture measures exactly what the original measured, from exactly where the original was taken and nowhere else.

horizoncorrect from 20 cm, at 160 mm wide44° across Drawn confidently

Measured down from the waterline

Whatever stands so far above the water, draw its reflection the same distance below. Through a vertical picture plane that is not an approximation — it is the reflection, to the arithmetic floor. Tilt the camera twenty-two degrees and it is eleven pixels out. Draw a gull, which touches the water nowhere, and guessing its waterline point wrong by two metres of depth costs fifty.

the seat the picture came fromthe screen, in planthe room sampledcurved monitor, 1 px of tolerance0.0% of the room inside The second projection

The screen that names the seat

A flat screen shows a homography of the intended picture from every seat in the room, and an observer's own framing is free to be a homography too — so a flat screen's picture is consistent with every seat there is. A curved one is not, and the seat comes back out of the picture in all three directions, in units of the screen's own radius.

ground line — right from anywherefaint: intended · solid: seendeparture (mm) against height (m)01.38the error map is an elation, with the ground line as its axisno characteristic ratio — nothing off the axis is fixed250 mm sidewayszero on the axis, 212.5 mm at the top Where to stand

Where the anamorph still works

A picture correct from one point raises an obvious question that nobody answers with a number — how far may the eye move. The answer here is exact rather than approximate: a wrong viewpoint composes the intended picture with a central collineation whose axis is the line the picture stands on, so the error is zero along that line and grows linearly upward, and a step sideways costs precisely as much as the same step upward.

horizon = eye level, 1.60 m89.89%correct from 26 cm, at 160 mm widespread 0 Constructing a view

The horizon, and the fraction

The horizon crosses every upright at the point of it that stands at the camera's own eye height — always, whatever the picture plane is doing. It crosses at the same *fraction* of the drawn height only when the plane is vertical: tilt by 6° and the fractions spread by 0.08 percentage points, tilt by 4° and 0.06. One statement is an incidence and survives; the other is a ratio and does not.

-1012-0.25000.2500.5000.750how many pixels of departure are allowed, log₁₀the volume of acceptable seats, log₁₀ cm³11×4 mm184×58 mmcurved monitor, the acceptable seats as a solidfitted exponent 2.978 against a cube law's 3 The second projection

The seats a screen will accept

Collect the seats whose picture is within a pixel of the one intended and the result is a solid — half a cubic centimetre in front of a curved desk monitor, a litre in front of a curved television. Ten times the tolerance is a thousand times the room, which is the pavement anamorph's own law arriving on an object that has nothing else in common with it.

00.2000.40005101520field angle, in degrees from the axislight lost, in stops10°17°23°one foreshortening, one tilt, two of distance0.48 stops at the corner The rectangle behind the lens

The corner sees an ellipse

A circular pupil viewed from off the axis is foreshortened by the cosine, so the blur patch a corner receives is an ellipse of axis ratio 0.920 at the edge of a full-frame picture with a 50 mm lens — and the light through it falls as the fourth power of the same cosine, 0.480 stops. Both are geometry, both happen to a perfect lens, and no design removes either.

fixatedthe lineHelmholtz · straight aheadpitch 0: a circle and a line What a pair is for

Both coordinates agree on a circle and a line

Two eyes fixating a point straight ahead see their horizontal image coordinates agree on a whole vertical cylinder over the Vieth–Müller circle, the same radius at every height to the last bit. Their vertical coordinates agree on almost none of it — 7.35 px apart at 26° aside and 30 cm up, 29.26 px when the fixation is brought to 60 cm. The points where both agree are the circle and one vertical line, and the line is the axis of the motion that carries one eye onto the other.

nothing on the ramp images above its vanishing linehorizonuphilllevelcorrect from 10 cm, at 160 mm wideslope recovered 22.0000° against 22° built Constructing a view

The ramp has its own horizon

Every plane has a vanishing line, and a ramp's is not the ground's. Its uphill edges meet on a line above the horizon, and the angle at the eye between that meeting point and the same direction taken level is the gradient — 22.0000° recovered against 22° built, out of the picture alone, with no scale, no ruler and nothing known about the scene except that the ground is level.

0102030400123how wide the audience is (m)the worst seat, in pixels of departure14.1 px per metrea flat panel of the same sizecurved television, the best single pre-warpthe flat panel's line is the axis The second projection

One picture and three people

A curved screen can be pre-warped for one seat, and the search over which seat to choose returns the middle one to a quarter of a per cent — there is nothing to be clever about. What the correction buys the sofa as a whole is six per cent, and the worst seat grows at fourteen pixels for every metre of audience, with no width at which it is zero except one person.

fixatedListing's law · 20° right and 20° uppitch 3.93 mm: one curve What a pair is for

Raise the gaze, and the line is gone

Turn two eyes 20° aside in the plane they share and the horopter keeps its vertical line — but the line stays in the median plane, 1.277 m ahead, not at the point being looked at. Raise the gaze as well and the rule by which each eye rolls decides the rest: Helmholtz's rule keeps a line; Listing's law and Fick's rule make the eyes' relative motion slide 3.93 mm and 7.09 mm along its axis, no point stays put, and the horopter becomes one curve.

barrel vaulteye · 1.62 mon the floor1e-12 mmon the vault529.4 mmworst miss of the best homography, log scalevault radius 4.0 m7.7% of the extent, against 4e-14% Where to stand

The ceiling that is not a plane

Paint the same design for the same eye onto a floor and onto a barrel vault, then fit the best possible homography to each set of marks. On the floor it misses by femtometres, because the map is a collineation and four marks determine every other. On the vault it misses by half a metre, and no choice of four marks helps — which is where every projective construction made for a floor stops applying.

-10100.5001the screen's radius, log₁₀ metresvertical difference between the eyes, log₁₀ arcminutesa stated fusion limit, 15′eyes 63 mm apart, at each screen's own sitting distanceunder the limit throughout The second projection

What the two eyes are sent

A reader's eyes are two seats sixty-three millimetres apart, so a curved screen delivers each of them a different map — and the part of the difference no homography absorbs is binocular evidence of the glass. Turned into a depth it comes back as the screen's own sag, 49 millimetres against 47 on a television, by a route that never saw the radius.

34363840-0.50000.5001distance the lens is focused at (m, log scale)horizontal angle of view (degrees)38.99 at 3 m37.76 at 1 m35.90 at 0.5 m39.60° at infinity35.90° at 0.5 m The rectangle behind the lens

Focusing is a zoom

A 50 mm lens focused at half a metre is not a 50 mm camera. It stands 55.56 mm from the sensor, its picture is a pinhole picture at that distance, and it covers 35.9° where the same lens at infinity covers 39.6°. Recover the camera from the picture and it reports 55.56 mm. Read the picture with the engraved 50 mm instead and a right angle comes back as 96.0°.

paraxial pupilthe stopa curved front elementcrossings 15.0 · 14.5 · 13.5 · 11.6 mm The real instrument

The entrance pupil walks with the angle

The place a picture is a projection from is not a point in a wide-angle design. Chief rays traced through a strongly curved front element cross the axis 15.07 mm behind its front vertex when they are nearly on the axis, and 4.23 mm nearer the front at 80° of field. So no pivot makes a wide panorama seam clean: at one metre, pivoting at the paraxial pupil leaves 4.39 arcminutes of misregistration along a seam, and the best pivot still leaves 1.41.

All themes