Piecewise map — where it appears
Named by 16 essays across 4 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Three distances in one landscape
A landscape assembled from a low station for the near ground, a level one for the middle and a high one for the far gives its furthest band 6.9 times the picture one camera would allow it — because the image of a fixed depth interval falls as one over depth squared, and its own station gives that back. What it costs is a jump in the rate at which depth runs, 2.50 at the first join and 2.75 at the second, and three views from one height leave no seam at all.
A landscape that changes its rule halfway up
A reader handed only the marks of a three-station landscape recovers each band's own camera height without being told any of them — 1.60 m, 4.00 m, 11.00 m, to 3.6e-15 m. What that same reader cannot recover across a join is a common ground: the next band's own marks read as a ground point 2.40 m away from the true one at the first seam, 7.00 m at the second.
A curved screen is eight flat ones
A projection matrix is a plane and nothing else, so a curved display cannot be rendered — it has to be driven as several planes and assembled. The gap between chord and arc is the whole error, it goes as the square of the angle each piece spans, and the piece count therefore goes as the inverse root of the tolerance — three for eight pixels, eight for one, fifteen for a quarter.
A shadow across an edge
A straight rod's shadow crossing the crease between floor and wall is two straight pieces, each dead straight to 1e-15 m, meeting at 35.08°. The corner is a fact about the room and not about the rod. Fit the floor's map from four marks and apply it across the whole shadow and the part on the wall comes back up to 78.9 cm from the object — the wrong map, applied confidently.
The stations are also a staircase
A level eye draws a ground point on a row that depends on the eye's height and the ground's only through their difference. So a landscape drawn from three stations at 1.6, 4 and 11 m over flat ground is, to 6 × 10⁻¹⁴ px across ninety-nine samples, the same picture as one eye at 11 m over ground stepped 9.4 m and 7.0 m above the far plain. The station heights a reader recovers are recovered on an assumption the marks neither supply nor test — and what would decide between the two readings is a cliff 103% of a band's own height, which is exactly where the convention lays its mist.
A seam breaks direction, not size
An eight-metre road crossing the first join of a three-station landscape is drawn 215.4 px wide under either band's rule, identically, and a six-metre post 161.5 px tall under either — the eye's height cancels out of any size taken at one depth. What does not cancel is where those sizes sit. The road's edges are turned 23.2° from each other and the post's foot lands 64.6 px out of place, and a painter butting two bands can absorb the offset and can never absorb the turn.
A shadow decides which landscape it is
One sun over a several-station landscape is one sun: every band images the light's direction and its shadows' at the same page point, and each reports the altitude as 22.000000°. A shadow is still dislocated at the join, and the reading that could not be settled by any ground point is settled by one — because a ray crossing the seam has a riser to descend that the flat reading does not give it, and the two tips land 5.94 m and 11.7 px apart.
Where a seam is allowed to go
Putting a join further off cuts the offset it forces from 210 px to 24 and leaves the turn at 23.2° exactly, so emptiness is a painter's only defence. And emptiness is not counted in metres: one twelve-metre object blocks 6.3 per cent of a landscape's depth wherever it stands and between 1.0 and 35.6 per cent of the picture, so how much room a seam has is set by where the landscape is crowded rather than by how much.
The anamorph that crosses a corner
Cast one design onto a floor and the wall at the end of it, from one eye. Each plane gets a collineation of its own; the two agree on the line where the planes meet, exactly, because a point of that line is a point of both. What they do not agree about is scale — the design runs 7.8 times its own size along the floor and 2.0 times up the wall, and the jump at the join is a factor of 3.9.
A seam that bends trades a turn for a gap
A join laid along a river bank instead of across one depth was supposed to go round what crosses it instead of avoiding it. It can, at a price: the far band can be lifted by one amount only, so a seam that wanders in depth opens a gap between the bands — 3 px buys the first join 1.2 m of wander, and going all the way round a twelve-metre object costs 15.8 px. Across a hundred landscapes, bending opens under 0.4 per cent of the picture that a straight seam did not already have.
What an eye can paint
A flight of steps has eighteen faces and no eye reaches more than fifteen. Pointed at a cluster of blocks, a seating rake and a corridor with a doorway in it, the same measurement finds 8 of 21, 7 of 13 and 6 of 7 — and the plane, which offers its whole self to every eye, is the control that makes the law a law rather than a fact about stairs.
A band lifted by columns bends its lines
A curved seam in a several-station landscape opens a gap because the far band is one picture lifted by one amount. Lift it column by column instead and the seam closes exactly — and the gap goes into the band's lines. Shift each column and every road bends by twice the old gap, horizon and all. Draw each column from its own eye and a road bends by 8.1 px near the seam and 3.0 at the band's far edge, dying only as one over its depth; the horizon stays straight; and the next join inherits 37 per cent of the gap the first one lost.
Facing the reader is not being reachable
A face turns toward the eye or it does not, and that is a dot product any reader can compute. Whether the eye’s rays actually land on it is a different question with a different answer — on a seating rake, three faces of ten that face the reader receive nothing, and they are 27 per cent of the facing area. On a corner the same test loses nothing at all, which is what makes the gap occlusion rather than arithmetic.
A design that lands in two rooms
Cast a design down a corridor with a doorway in it and four per cent of the picture goes through the opening and lands on a wall three metres beyond, at 9.4 metres from the eye against the end wall's 6.4. The picture is continuous across the edge of the doorway and its scale jumps by half again, which is a corner anamorph's discontinuity with a gap in the middle of it instead of a fold.
The stretch decides the band
A design band chosen by geometry — the rays that meet the object — includes rays that graze along it, and a grazing ray lands two design points twenty times further apart than the design says. Cap the stretch at four and a bare floor keeps 55 per cent of its design, a corner 80, and the top of a descending flight all of it.
One flight, two pictures
From the top of a descending flight every riser faces away, so the design lands entirely on treads. From the foot of the same flight the risers take 68 per cent of the design at a median stretch of 1.4, and the treads take the rest at a median of 2.6. Give each reader the faces the other cannot use and one staircase carries two pictures, with no face asked to hold both.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Moving viewpointStation pointElevationSeamAnamorphosisDepth compressionFree parameterReceiving surfaceForeshorteningPicture surfaceDrawing conventionOcclusion