Concept

Degenerate configuration — where it appears

An arrangement on which a construction's fit becomes singular rather than merely poor — collinear points where a line is wanted, concurrent lines where a point is. Such arrangements are a set of measure zero, so a sweep of plausible cases will never find one and it has to be built on purpose.

Named by 11 essays across 6 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

left pictureright pictureevery one of them fits every mark1.6e-6 px

A flat scene fixes no second eye

Eight marks on one plane leave the eight-point design matrix two ranks short, so a two-parameter family of fundamental matrices satisfies every mark exactly — three of its members are 1.41 apart after normalisation and all three fit to 1.6 × 10⁻⁶ pixels. The same photographs determine the plane's own map from four marks, to 5.9 × 10⁻¹³ pixels.

twoviews · Planar
0306090-3-2-1out-of-plane spread, as a fraction of the scene's own extent (powers of ten)error in the recovered translation direction, in degreeswith 0.3 px of reading errorexact marksthe geometry is a step and the measurement is a slope9 reliefs

How flat is flat enough

With exact marks the transition has no width at all — 84° of pose error at exactly coplanar and 0.000° at eight parts in ten thousand of relief. Put three tenths of a pixel of reading error in and the same sweep becomes a slope three decades wide, crossing into usefulness when the out-of-plane parallax reaches about ten times the marking error.

twoviews · Planar
024010203040how far the mirror is turned from square, in degreeswhat three tenths of a pixel can cost, in millimetresnearly squareone mark, 0.3 px of marking error3.0× across the range

Square to the camera is the worst mirror

A mirror pair's baseline runs along the mirror's normal, so a mirror facing the camera puts the second eye directly behind the first — the forward-motion arrangement, with the epipole in the middle of the frame and the rays to a mark crossing at 23°. Turning it forty-four degrees opens that to 65° and cuts the worst depth error threefold, and the number to watch is not the angle but where the reflected lens sits on the print.

mirrors · Mirrorpair
the second pictureepipole22 parallax lines miss the epipole by at most 1.7e-10 pxsecond camera stepped forward

Two marks off a known plane find the other eye

Map a courtyard's ground from one picture into the other, and every raised mark lands somewhere the map did not send it — displaced along a line through the image of the other camera, to a fifth of a billionth of a pixel. Two such marks put that image where it is, and with it the whole epipolar geometry.

twoviews · Planar
the camera's horizoncorrect from 19 cm, at 160 mm wide46° across

A picture with nothing straight in it

Every construction on this site is handed the horizon, and a photograph of a crowd, a hillside or a curved façade has no straight edge to give it. What such a picture does have is repetition — and three things of one height put the horizon exactly where the camera has it, from the picture alone. Two things do not, and three standing abreast do not either, and both refusals are the reader's ordinary situation.

construction · Eyelevel
left pictureright picturethe post it is matched toone image row, drawn as two strips19.8 m instead of 9.0

A third eye that lands on the next post

Match one post of a railing to its neighbour and the pair reports it at 19.8 metres instead of 9.0, with every test two photographs can run at the arithmetic floor. A third picture usually exposes that by hundreds of pixels — but at five azimuths in seventy-eight degrees the wrong point lands within three pixels of another post, and the third view confirms the mistake. Narrow the railing to twenty centimetres and those places cover 28 per cent of the arc.

depth · Outlier
floorwallfloor 36.3° · wall 29.3°dihedral 6.9°

The room a divergent picture is a photograph of

A divergent construction depicts a rectangle on a plane leaning toward the camera, and the splay alone sets how far — 36.3° at a splay of 1.32. Stand a second such construction on the first one's far edge, as a wall, and the two recovered planes meet at 6.9°, not at the right angle a real room's corner would need.

conventions · Divergent
drawn along a fixed direction, not from a pointelevation 52°centre-fit refused

What a removed wall costs that a removed roof does not

Fitting a single centre to a building with its near wall deleted lands at 3.0e-15 m — the arithmetic floor — because deleting a wall does not touch the projection, only which surfaces are drawn. Fitting the identical routine to the same building with its roof removed does not return a number at all: handed a bundle of genuinely parallel rays, it refuses outright.

conventions · Fukinuki
under the lampa scatter, in planground conditioning 2.1e-1

The arrangement the count cannot see

Five posts laid out five different ways give the same leverage to a sixth and the same separation limit to a quarter, and the sixth arrangement — posts strung out along their own shadows, built to be exactly degenerate — is no worse than the rest. The degeneracy belongs to the family the count does not use, and its conditioning there is exactly zero.

light · Pointcount
correct from 22 cm, at 160 mm wide181 cast crossings

A dent breaks the terminator

A ball's lit boundary is one closed curve, 313.2 cm around; press a dimple into its top and, at 45° of elevation, the walk that traces it finds 181 crossings where a point still faces the light but is occluded by the body's own rim — a second curve, 23.1 cm long, that a convex surface can never produce. The two curves meet where the dent's own deepest point goes dark, at 50.952°, with the ray's clearance reaching zero at a stationary point rather than merely a small one.

light · Terminator
the true profileexact marksrms 4.9e-15 m

A shadow edge read as a profile

A lamp, a stick and a camera recover a stepped object's profile to 4.9e-15 m rms when the marks are exact, and to 10.4 mm once they are read to two tenths of a pixel — the same linear law a fitted exponent of 1.001 confirms. What actually sets that number is the angle between the sweeping light plane and the camera's own ray — the amplification is least, 17.0 times a pixel, broadside at 6°, and grows without bound toward -36.1°, where the plane contains the camera's own eye and the recovery keeps none of its marks at all.

light · Scan

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

ConditioningBaselineResidualEpipolar geometryFundamental matrixHomographyPoint lightsingular valuesTriangulationDegeneracyEpipoleinstrument limit

All concepts