Refraction — where it appears
Named by 13 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The dome knows its offset in units of itself
A dome port centred on the entrance pupil bends nothing at all, exactly. One that is not bends rays by an amount that depends on the decentring over the radius and on nothing else, so a ten-centimetre dome six millimetres off centre and a twenty-centimetre dome twelve millimetres off centre are the same instrument, bit for bit. The picture carries the ratio, which means it never carries the radius.
One surface, two images
A water surface reflects what is above it and refracts what is below it in the same photograph, from the same plane. The reflected half has a centre of projection to 1 × 10⁻¹⁴ m and every theorem about central projection applies to it; the refracted half misses its own best-fitting point by 28.6 mm and none of it does. And the landscape manual's rule for drawing a reflection turns out to be the epipole placed at infinity, which is why it costs nothing at zero tilt and 11.5 px at twenty-two degrees.
A ball of water has no eye either
A flat interface is not a projection through a centre and misses by ten millimetres. A sphere of water misses by more than that on a ball the size of a plum — 1.3 mm on a fifty-millimetre radius, and the axis crossings spread over 18.6 mm at seven tenths of the aperture. But at two per cent of the radius the same fit returns 24 nanometres, so a ball does have a centre — one at zero aperture and none by the time it is gathering any light.
The entrance pupil walks with the angle
The place a picture is a projection from is not a point in a wide-angle design. Chief rays traced through a strongly curved front element cross the axis 15.07 mm behind its front vertex when they are nearly on the axis, and 4.23 mm nearer the front at 80° of field. So no pivot makes a wide panorama seam clean: at one metre, pivoting at the paraxial pupil leaves 4.39 arcminutes of misregistration along a seam, and the best pivot still leaves 1.41.
The stick a stereo pair puts back
Two eyes side by side reconstruct a submerged stick exactly as the sagittal image — kinked 14.96° — and two eyes one above the other exactly as the tangential one, kinked 9.59°. Roll the baseline between them and the two rays to a point miss each other by up to 3.13 millimetres, past the 2.85 a pixel covers at that range, and the reconstruction is a third stick that is neither — 551 millimetres of a one-metre stick, with its tip at 0.405 metres against a true 0.866.
The residual does not warn
Fit a straight line to the stick a stereo pair puts back and the fit looks best exactly where the reconstruction is least supported: the residual is 0.535 mm at a level baseline, where the two rays meet perfectly, and 0.038 mm at sixty degrees of roll, inside the band where they miss by more than a pixel covers. Over the same sweep the fitted line is 285 to 584 mm short of the stick's metre — fourteen thousand times its own residual at worst.
A fit weighted by the miss trusts only the surface
Weight each point of a reconstructed underwater stick by how well its two rays meet, and the fit hands all but a ten-billionth of its trust to the one point where the stick enters the water — and reports a residual of nothing at every rolled baseline. Floored at the reading error, the weighting changes the answer by a few thousandths of a millimetre. And the miss itself, the one honest number, is exactly zero at a level baseline where the stick comes back 285 mm short.
A third eye sees the water the pair cannot
A level stereo pair looking at a stick in water gets two rays that meet exactly and a stick 285 mm too short, with nothing to warn it. A third eye raised ten centimetres above the pair sees a disagreement of 2.6 pixels at the stick's tip. Asked to agree with the other two as if there were no water, it hides nearly all of that and makes the stick shorter still. Told only that there is a flat surface, the same three eyes find its refractive index and put the metre back.
A water surface's height trades against its index
Three eyes that must find the water's surface as well as its index find the two along a valley: a surface assumed higher bends every ray sooner, and an index assumed weaker makes up for it. From one stick at a quarter pixel the index is known to ±0.14 and the surface to ±48 mm, and the fits do worse than that promises — they slide down the valley, and the metre-long stick comes back 881 mm. A second stick eight metres out narrows the valley to ±7.6 mm. Holding water's own index at 1.333 closes it: the surface to ±23 mm, the stick to 994.
A straight stick tests the index only across the sight
Told that each stick is straight, three eyes fitting a water surface's height and its index still slide down the valley between them — when the stick leans away from them. A wrong index carries such a stick into another straight stick, off its line by 0.016 mm and 116 mm short. Turned to lean across the line of sight, the same wrong index bows it by 2.2 mm, and the straight-line fit's slide falls from 0.058 to nothing. A tape on the stick, read only to ±50 mm, stops the slide outright.
A bowed stick is read as a wrong index
Holding a stick to a straight line cured the slide in a refraction fit — but only for a stick leaning across the sight, where a wrong index bows the read stick by two millimetres. A stick that is itself bowed by a millimetre in the same plane is, to that constraint, a straight stick seen through the wrong index: read without error, it moves the fitted index by 0.074 one way or 0.062 the other, and at a quarter pixel the constraint's bias overtakes the slide it was removing at about three-quarters of a millimetre of bow. Its misfit is a fiftieth of a pixel, so nothing in the residuals says so. A tape, which measures length, does not notice the bow at all.
Crooked sticks cancel each other's bows slowly, and eight of them match a tape
A stick bowed by a millimetre fools a refraction fit that holds it to a straight line: the fit reads the bow as a wrong index. Several sticks each bowed in its own random direction pull the index both ways, and the pulls cancel — but not as one over the square root of the count, because the sticks do not pull equally: a near stick pulls two and a half times harder than a far one, and a stick leaning just off the line of sight tens of times harder than one leaning straight along it. Eight crooked sticks leave the index ±0.016 out where one leaves it ±0.037, and with a quarter pixel of reading error they read it to ±0.037 — exactly what one straight stick with its length taped does. The earlier guess was that matching a tape would take a large number.
A crooked stick hides in a quarter pixel, and its residual finds it only below a tenth
Eight sticks stand in still water, one of them bowed three millimetres and the rest one, and a refraction fit holds every stick to a straight line. Read exactly, the bad stick carries the largest share of the fit's residual in about seven sets of ten. Read to a quarter pixel, as a careful photograph is, it carries it in one set of five, barely more than chance: a millimetre of bow moves the index more than the reading error does and leaves its rays missing by a twelfth of a quarter pixel. The residual stays blind until the bad stick is bowed five or ten millimetres, and dropping the stick it ranks worst does nothing measurable for the index.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Triangulationleast squaresRefractive indexcentre of projectionCollinearityinstrument limitskew raysSnell's lawApparent-depthBaselineBiasMidpoint