Concept

depth of field — where it appears

The interval of distances inside which the blur disc stays under a stated diameter. Its near and far limits, its asymmetry and the hyperfocal distance are all one number's arithmetic, and the number is a decision about a reader rather than about a lens.

Named by 5 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

a point at 1.5 mthe pupilthe sensorwhere it focusesf/2.8, focused at 3 m5.8 px across

The centre has an area

Every theorem of perspective follows from a projection through a point, and no instrument has one. Give the pupil a radius and each world point images as a disc — whose centre is the pinhole's mark to 5.7 × 10⁻¹⁴ millimetres, at every aperture, every distance and every field angle. The geometry survives exactly; only the sharpness is spent.

sensor · Aperture
00.50011.50-0.25000.2500.5000.750the blur a reader is prepared to call sharp, in pixels (powers of ten)near and far limits of the band, in metres (powers of ten)the focus distance2 pxone lens, one focus setting, five criteria5 bands

The sharp band is a decision

One 50 mm lens at f/2.8 focused at three metres has a sharp band half a metre deep or an unbounded one, and nothing about the optics changes between them — only how large a blur disc a reader is prepared to ignore. Every quantity usually quoted about depth of field is that acceptance restated, including the rule that a third of the band lies in front, which is true at one distance and nowhere else.

sensor · Aperture
the pupilan opaque edge120 mmf/1.4, focused at 6 m3 of 5 rays get past

A pupil sees around an edge

Two backgrounds identical everywhere a pinhole can see, differing only in the strip an occluder hides from it, produce identical pinhole pictures and pupil pictures 42 per cent apart. So no function of the sharp image — no kernel, no depth-dependent kernel, nothing — produces the picture a real lens makes, and the reach behind the edge is R(Z₂/Z₁ − 1), which is 120 mm here.

sensor · Aperture
at one depth — a stadium, to 1.8e-5receding — tapered, 4% outone point, one exposure, the whole pupil1.8e-5 against 4%

The disc and the streak

A frame integrates over the pupil and over the exposure at once. Hold the point's depth and the patch is exactly the streak of its centres with one disc slid along it, to 1.8 × 10⁻⁵ of its own width. Let it recede over the same exposure and the disc's radius falls by 3.7 along the streak, and the patch departs from any single kernel by 16 pixels.

sensor · Aperture
0.30.71.537200.11101001000distance the lens is focused at (m, log scale)how far the recovered distance can be out (% , log scale)vanishing points ±0.25 pxvanishing points ±1 px±0.25 px: 0.7 % at 1 m → 28 % at 30 m50 mm lens

A close picture carries its own distance

A 50 mm lens focused at one metre stands 2.632 mm beyond its focal length, and a picture records where the lens stood. Recover that from two vanishing points, put in the engraved focal length, and the focus distance comes back — to 0.7 per cent at 1 m, 3.7 at 5 m, and as an interval 28 per cent wide at 30 m. A single picture has given a scale. What it has given is where the lens was focused, and the subject can be anywhere in a sharp band two to fifteen times wider.

sensor · Format

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Circle of confusionApertureEntrance pupilSensorFocal lengthinstrument limitConvolutionExit pupilExposureHyperfocal distancePinholePoint spread function

All concepts