Concept

braccio — where it appears

The Florentine arm's length, the unit a fifteenth-century pavement is laid out in and the unit Alberti's construction divides its ground line into. It is a length in the world; the picture records only the ratio of it to the panel's viewing distance, which is why a pavement never states a size.

Named by 7 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

the panelhorizon — the centric point's heightthe section — the eye, the panel, the ground470 px — the viewing distancethree routes agree to 6e-14 pxsection, distance point, and a pinhole camera

Alberti draws a pavement, and chooses where the reader stands

The costruzione legittima of 1435 is exact. Run as a construction — with drawn rays and drawn intersections rather than the formula it turns out to satisfy — it agrees with a pinhole camera to six parts in a hundred trillion of a pixel. And it has one free parameter that the recipe never names, which is the distance from the eye to the panel.

construction · Alberti
-8-6-4-20012345678tile corner along the diagonal, from the near endsigned distance off the chord (px)the constant-ratio rulea correct pavement, crept 4.5%8 braccia, unpaintedone arc, two causes

A steady creep draws the rule's bow

The arc reading was built to find the constant-ratio rule by the shape its pavements bow the diagonal. A correct pavement painted by a hand that lets each transversal gap grow 4.5 per cent on the last bows it the same way — to 0.31 pixels, a cosine of 0.9994 — on eight braccia, and 1.5 per cent is enough on twenty-two. The arc reading measures how much a pavement's tiles lengthen, not what lengthened them, and against its counterfeit it is a coin. The rule's own definition still tells them apart: its gaps' logarithms are straight, a correct pavement's bend. Read to half a pixel, that names the rule on eight braccia 94 times in a hundred.

wrong · Taughtratio
00.50011.50246812braccia in the pavementthe arc reading's amplitude (1 is the rule's bow)the rule's bowone creep for the handfour pavements of one interior, unpaintedbars: ±1σ at 1 px

A panel's pavements convict the creep one pavement hides

One crept pavement bows its diagonal exactly as the constant-ratio rule does. A whole interior has several — a floor, a step, a table's inlay, a loggia's coffers — and the rule bows each by the same share of its own bow, where one steady creep bows a twelve-braccio pavement 1.72 times as much and a four-braccio step 0.62 times: four pavements painted to a pixel name the rule against it every time. A creep tuned pavement by pavement to counterfeit every bow is caught instead by the gaps, whose curvature has one sign on every correct pavement: four pavements name the rule ninety times in a hundred at a pixel, eight pavements ninety-seven.

wrong · Taughtratio
the distance pointAlberti's sectionthe measuring pointcorrect from 12 cm at 160 mm widethree routes, 0e+0 px apart

Three procedures, one panel

Alberti's lateral section, the distance-point construction and a pinhole camera put every transversal at the same pixel — and every reading of the finished drawing therefore returns the same number for all three. The methods are distinguishable on the desk and indistinguishable on the panel, which is the fact any attribution has to start from.

construction · Attribution
00.050the pavements, in the order they were paintedcreep a braccio, fitted from the transversalsthe floora loggia's coffersa stepa table's inlayticks: the creep painteddots: the creep reada hand at one pixelnamed a step → the floor → a loggia's coffers → a table's inlay

A panel's creeps keep the order it was painted in, while the hand is steady

A painter who tires lets each pavement's gaps creep a little more than the last one's. Fit each pavement's creep from its transversals and rank them, and the ranking is the order the panel was painted in: with the creep growing a point a braccio from one pavement to the next and the hand at a pixel, the whole order of four pavements comes back fifty-seven times in a hundred, against one in twenty-four by chance. The step is the weak link — four short gaps fix its creep to two points — and a creep set by each pavement's length rather than by time reads as a confident order that is not the painting's at all.

wrong · Taughtratio
the constant-ratio rulecorners off the chord by 8.03 pxAlberti's sectioncorners off the chord by 2.47 px

A straightedge convicts the rule on five braccia

The constant-ratio rule for spacing a pavement's boards leaves one mark a correct construction does not: its tile corners bow off the diagonal. The worry was that a painter's hand would bury the bow in its own scatter. At a pixel of scatter it does not, on any pavement of five braccia or more. What limits the test is not the hand but the page: a pavement drawn to one width bows no more at twenty braccia than at eight, while the hand's wander keeps growing with every tile.

wrong · Taughtratio
-7.50-5-2.5002.50012345678tile corner along the diagonal, from the near endsigned distance off the chord (px)the rule's arc, unpaintedthe rule painted: amplitude 0.84a construction painted: -0.178 braccia, 1 px of scatterone shape, one amplitude

The rule's bow is read by its shape

A straightedge on a painted pavement's diagonal convicts the constant-ratio rule by the size of its corners' worst departure, and gives out once the painter's hand scatters by a third of the bow. The bow has more than a size. It is one smooth arc, to one side, fixed by the ratio, and a hand's scatter is neither. Fit that arc with one free amplitude and the rule is ranked above a construction 96 times in a hundred on five braccia at two pixels, where the straightedge managed 83 — and the reading holds to half the bow's size in scatter.

wrong · Taughtratio

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

AttributionPavementConstant-ratioFalsifiabilityleast squaresResidualStraightedge constructioncostruzione legittimaTransversalViewing distanceCentric pointCross-ratio

All concepts