The thread: Not a projection at all — page 3
A wedge of glass turns the camera behind it
A pane with parallel faces moves every point and no direction, so the camera recovered through a window is the camera that took the picture. Tilt one face 2° and every direction turns, by 1.04° on the axis and 1.67° forty degrees off it. The best rotation of the frame, 1.14°, still leaves 0.94 px, and no homography does much better, so the picture is no longer a projection from the camera's centre. The camera recovered from three vanishing points through the same glass is turned 3.37° — three times as far — because vanishing points lie where the glass bends most.
The rectangle behind the lensA turning frame can be straightened; a travelling one cannot
Read a frame row by row while the camera turns at a radian a second and every point is 21 px from where a global shutter would put it, at every depth alike. Turn each row's rays back and every point returns to six trillionths of a pixel, with no depth known. Travel at 3 m/s instead, and the best correction that needs no depth is exact at one distance and 21 px wrong at 2 m.
The real instrumentA model that inverts has a horizon instead of a fold
The polynomial every calibration fits turns around at a finite radius and stops being a map from direction to picture. The division model, chosen because it inverts in closed form, never turns around — it rises for ever toward a horizon at one over the root of its own coefficient, so the whole hemisphere of directions lands inside a finite disc. Fitted to the four fisheye laws it follows every one of them more closely than the polynomial at every field from forty degrees to eighty — a hundred times more closely for the equidistant law at forty, and the stereographic law exactly.
What each system gave upThe exclusion is two conditions, not ten rows
Ten systems have been measured and none has both a centre and a true measure. Ten is not a proof. Swept across the whole two-slit family — eighty-one members, both parameters run out to infinity — a centre appears at exactly the eight members whose slits sit at one finite distance, a measure at exactly the seventeen with a slit at infinity, and at none of them both. The case the two conditions appear to leave open is closed by the rays themselves: one divide is a slit, and eight page points use 6.02 m of it.
The second projectionA projector in the viewer's eye
A projector paints a wall along its own rays, so from the projector's own position the wall's shape is invisible — exactly, on a cylinder, on a dome and on a plane alike. Move a hand's breadth away and the residual is pixels. The one place a projector can stand and ignore the shape of what it is throwing onto is the eye of the person watching.
Through water and glassThe stick a stereo pair puts back
Two eyes side by side reconstruct a submerged stick exactly as the sagittal image — kinked 14.96° — and two eyes one above the other exactly as the tangential one, kinked 9.59°. Roll the baseline between them and the two rays to a point miss each other by up to 3.13 millimetres, past the 2.85 a pixel covers at that range, and the reconstruction is a third stick that is neither — 551 millimetres of a one-metre stick, with its tip at 0.405 metres against a true 0.866.
Where to standAn anamorph has one eye
From the design point exactly — a camera's single eye — the floor marks give the design back to sixteen decimal places. A head carries two eyes 63 mm apart, and neither of them is the design point. The difference between the disparity the floor gives and the disparity an upright board would give runs to 47 arcminutes, against a stereoacuity of a few tens of arcseconds. This is why pavement paintings are photographed.
The real instrumentFocusing moves the pivot past its best place
Focusing a fifty-millimetre lens to one metre carries its entrance pupil 2.63 millimetres forward of the camera body, and to half a metre 5.56 — which is more than the whole 5.53 that the pupil walks with field angle, so past a subject at 502 millimetres the focus decides where the pupil is. A panorama head aligned at infinity and used at a metre leaves 7.46 arcminutes along its seam; aligned at four metres it leaves 2.21, better than pivoting at the pupil at all.
Surfaces that are not flatThe pivot that is not the eye
A camera bolted to a tripod turns about the screw under its baseplate, and the light crosses somewhere else. Every ray of the panorama that results passes the pivot by e sin γ — the offset times the sine of how far off its own frame's axis the ray points — so the picture has a radius where a projection would have a point.
Surfaces that are not flatThe parallax you cannot shoot away
A stitched panorama's parallax has two halves and they do not behave alike. The one across the seam falls as the sine of half a frame spacing, so more frames buy it off; the one up the frame is the sine of half the frame's own height, and no quantity of shooting touches it. They cross at π over β, which has no pivot error in it at all.
Mirrors that are not camerasCloser than they appear, by a factor with a number in it
A wing mirror of one metre radius held eighty centimetres from the eye reports 1.30 metres for an object at sixty-four, because the image of anything distant sits half a radius behind the glass. The size such an object subtends reads as a distance 2.60 times the true one, and the factor is exactly one plus twice the eye's distance over the radius — so the warning is a number, and it is larger for the mirror that is further away.
The real instrumentA stereographic fisheye is a division model
The division model divides the picture radius by one plus a coefficient times its square. The fits that compared it with the polynomial were not of that model: they multiplied instead, and the model they measured has neither a fold nor a horizon. Fitted as it is written, the division model follows every fisheye law more closely than the polynomial at every field from forty degrees, and the stereographic law it follows exactly — the law is the model, with a coefficient of minus a quarter. Its horizon then turns out to sit beyond the lens's own ninety degrees, and pinning it there is a trade rather than a free constraint.
The rectangle behind the lensA frame's shear knows travel only over depth
Read a frame row by row while the camera turns and travels, and every vertical post leans — the near ones more. The lean is the turn plus the travel over the post's depth, and that sum is all the frame holds: twice the travel past posts twice as far draws the same frame to eighteen decimal places. Two posts cannot separate turn from travel. A facade can, because a turn leans the edges of the frame more than its middle, but the two signals are 99.8 per cent alike, and reading them apart takes a pixel on every row.
The real instrumentAn image circle pins a fisheye's horizon, if its field is known
A fisheye picture stops at a circle, and for a lens covering exactly 180° that circle is the ninety-degree radius a division model calls its horizon. Handed to a calibration as one more observation, read to two pixels, it takes the error at the edge of an equidistant lens from 9.4 pixels to 2.0 — at a cost of 0.3 pixels inside the field the targets covered. Read as ninety degrees on a lens that really covers 190°, it makes the edge five times worse than no circle at all.
Mirrors that are not camerasA mirror pays for its field out of its aperture
Any map from the eye's angles to the world's is a mirror, by one line of arithmetic, so a mirror can be designed by what it does. The field is then a sum along the glass of one over the size factor, which caps it at the aperture over the smallest factor allowed, and a simple map reaches that cap. A surface free to take any profile still cannot read both directions at one constant factor unless it is flat.
Surfaces that are not flatA rig is right on one surface
Several cameras looking outward have several centres, and no warp registers all of a scene. The residual is a disparity, so the depth the stitch is computed for has an exact optimum — the harmonic midpoint of the depth range, not the middle of it — and the arithmetic middle costs a factor of 2 z_far over the sum, which tends to two.
The real instrumentA refocused panorama is six lenses
Refocus between the frames of a room panorama and each frame is its own camera: its pupil carried forward by its own extension, its picture made at its own principal distance. The best fixed pivot then leaves 12.9 arcminutes along the worst seam, and a head that slides the camera back as the lens extends leaves 2.82 — the lens's walk alone. The pivot's share is first order and worth a tracking head indoors. But a stitcher that reads all six frames with one focal length misregisters by up to 270 arcminutes, which is the larger mistake by ninety times.
Mirrors that are not camerasThe mirror with an eye is the one that is sharp
A convex mirror focuses a distant point at two depths, and the gap between them is exactly the gap between its two size factors, so a mirror's blur can be read off its map. Hold the two factors equal at every point and the blur vanishes. That mirror turns out to be a familiar shape, and it is also the only one with a single centre of projection.
Systems that kept the measureTwo stations in one picture
A parallel floor under a perspective room found one map absorbing two centres into one sheet. Split a two-rule picture down the middle instead and each half hands back its own horizon — 7.80 px apart at a rule-mix of 0.02 — and no eye's position has anything to do with the gap, because an ordinary pinhole picture's recovered horizon does not depend on where the eye stood at all.
The real instrumentOne focus stopped down is as sharp as six in a deep room
Refocusing a room panorama frame by frame costs a seam of 12.9 arcminutes on a fixed head. One focus stopped down costs none of that, and at f/40 holds half a metre to four metres to 5.27 arcminutes — sharper than the fixed head's seam, blunter than a tracking head's 2.82. But the comparison flatters refocusing: the frame on the table also holds the wall behind it, so it cannot be held sharper than 5.27 however it is focused. Counted properly, one focus on a plain head comes within 2.4 per cent of the geared one, and pays for it in light.
Systems that kept the measureWhat a removed wall costs that a removed roof does not
Fitting a single centre to a building with its near wall deleted lands at 3.0e-15 m — the arithmetic floor — because deleting a wall does not touch the projection, only which surfaces are drawn. Fitting the identical routine to the same building with its roof removed does not return a number at all: handed a bundle of genuinely parallel rays, it refuses outright.
Surfaces that are not flatThe arcs the five-point construction actually draws
The taught five-point construction draws circular arcs between five vanishing points and instructs a draughtsman to graduate the radius evenly. Read that way, the arcs miss a straight line's true image by up to 3.75 pixels on a 300-pixel disc. Read at the stereographic scale instead, the same arcs are exact to 4.3e-13 pixels — the construction was always drawing one projection, and the taught scale was never it.
Surfaces that are not flatThe hole a rig cannot fill
A two-lens spherical rig covers every direction between its two lenses and still cannot see 0.470 per cent of the sphere directly beneath it, reaching 12.8 degrees from straight down — its own tripod, standing exactly where neither lens can look. No arrangement of lenses removes it, because it is not a gap in coverage; it is the rig occluding itself.
Drawn confidentlyThe rule is exact for a floor that lengthens
The constant-ratio rule for spacing receding boards is an exact perspective — to the last digit, on the panel's own horizon — of a floor whose boards grow by the inverse of the ratio, 0.74 braccia deep at the front and 1.31 at the back on an eight-braccio pavement. The orthogonals agree with that floor. What says the tiles were meant to be square is a diagonal, which bends 8.1 pixels off straight where the reader's fitting test finds a sixth of one.