Ladder

Rectangle — the ladder

3 distinct arguments against one idea, from the one that introduces it to the one that assumes the rest.
  1. vanishing point 1vanishing point 2where the camera wasassumed centre 50% alongfocal 1129.9 px · 0.283 : 1

    The arc every eye stands on

    Four drawn corners known to be a rectangle fix the horizon of their plane and nothing else. The eye that drew them has to see the two vanishing points at a right angle, so it lies on the circle those points are a diameter of — and every point of that arc reconstructs a genuine rectangle, with right angles to five parts in ten million million of a degree, and a different proportion.

    rung 3 · construction
  2. 00.2500.5000.750120406080assumed centre of the picture, % of the way between the vanishing pointsreconstructed proportion of the rectanglethe rectangle that was there, 0.667 : 115.7× across the arcevery one a true rectangle

    The proportion is the assumption

    Read the proportions of a rectangle out of a photograph of it and the answer is a function of where the centre of the picture is assumed to be. Sweeping that assumption across the horizon takes one drawn quadrilateral from one part in fourteen to slightly wider than square, every reconstruction a genuine rectangle, and only a fiftieth of the sweep within five per cent of the truth.

    rung 4 · construction
  3. 02.5e+35e+37.5e+31e+4200400600800one corner, slid along the picture (px)focal length the quadrilateral implies (px)admitted to 886 pxrefused past 903 px

    The quadrilateral no rectangle casts

    The relation that reads a camera out of a drawn rectangle has a minus sign in it, and the minus sign is a refusal: two vanishing points on the same side of the assumed centre give the square root of a positive number, and no camera makes that quadrilateral out of a rectangle. Watching the refusal arrive shows what it is worth — one corner has to travel most of the picture's width before it fires.

    rung 5 · construction

All ladders